vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ametek (AME) and Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Molson Coors Beverage Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.4× Ametek). Ametek runs the higher net margin — 20.7% vs 5.5%, a 15.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ametek posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 2.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Ametek's revenue compounded faster (5.4% CAGR vs -15.8%).
AMETEK, Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate and global designer and manufacturer of electronic instruments and electromechanical devices with headquarters in the United States and over 150 sites worldwide.
Molson Coors Beverage Company is a Canadian-American multinational drink and brewing company headquartered in Chicago, Illinois and Montreal, Quebec.
AME vs TAP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $2.7B |
| Net Profit | $399.4M | $150.1M |
| Gross Margin | 37.2% | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | 26.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 20.7% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.3% | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 13.5% | 25.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.74 | $0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | $399.4M | $150.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $398.6M | $238.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $371.4M | $-2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $428.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.8M | $121.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.3M | $287.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $340.2M | $199.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.7M | $427.0M |
| Q1 26 | 37.2% | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.0% | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.3% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | 31.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.6% | 32.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.0% | 34.6% |
| Q1 26 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | -98.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | 15.6% |
| Q1 26 | 20.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.9% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | -84.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | $1.74 | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.73 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.60 | $-14.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.55 | $2.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.52 | $0.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.67 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.47 | $0.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.45 | $2.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $481.3M | $382.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.9B | $10.3B |
| Total Assets | $16.3B | $22.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.38× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $481.3M | $382.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $458.0M | $896.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $439.2M | $950.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $619.7M | $613.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $399.0M | $412.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.0M | $969.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.6M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.0B |
| Q1 26 | $10.9B | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $13.2B |
| Q1 26 | $16.3B | $22.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $22.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2B | $22.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | $26.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9B | $25.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.6B | $26.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $26.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $27.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.22× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-212.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $584.3M | $540.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $440.9M | $616.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $359.1M | $718.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $417.5M | $-90.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $550.0M | $494.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $487.2M | $521.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $381.4M | $869.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-212.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $527.3M | $357.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.0M | $483.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $329.8M | $555.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $394.5M | $-328.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $498.3M | $383.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $460.9M | $350.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $360.0M | $691.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | -7.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | -12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.3% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 4.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | 2.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 1.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.19× | -0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.43× | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AME
| Electronic Instruments | $1.3B | 66% |
| Electromechanical | $663.9M | 34% |
TAP
Segment breakdown not available.
