vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ametek (AME) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.3× Ametek). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 19.9%, a 2.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 13.4%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $527.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs 7.3%).
AMETEK, Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate and global designer and manufacturer of electronic instruments and electromechanical devices with headquarters in the United States and over 150 sites worldwide.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
AME vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $398.6M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | 36.0% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 25.3% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 19.9% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.4% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.9% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.73 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $398.6M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $371.4M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.8M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.3M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $340.2M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.7M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $310.9M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | 36.0% | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.3% | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.6% | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.0% | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.1% | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.3% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.0% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | 19.9% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.9% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.73 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.60 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.55 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.52 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.67 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.47 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.45 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.34 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $458.0M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.6B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $16.1B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $458.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $439.2M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $619.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $399.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.3M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.6M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $373.8M | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.6B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.9B | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.22× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $584.3M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $527.3M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.4% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.47× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7B | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $584.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $440.9M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $359.1M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $417.5M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $550.0M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $487.2M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $381.4M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $410.2M | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | $527.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.0M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $329.8M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $394.5M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $498.3M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $460.9M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $360.0M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $382.6M | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.3% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.0% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.19× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.19× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.43× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.32× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AME
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.1B | 54% |
| Electronic Instruments Group | $620.1M | 31% |
| Transferred Over Time | $294.6M | 15% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
