vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AFFILIATED MANAGERS GROUP, INC. (AMG) and Match Group (MTCH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Match Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($864.0M vs $556.6M, roughly 1.6× AFFILIATED MANAGERS GROUP, INC.). AFFILIATED MANAGERS GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 62.4% vs 19.3%, a 43.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AFFILIATED MANAGERS GROUP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.2% vs 4.0%). AFFILIATED MANAGERS GROUP, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($254.5M vs $174.0M). Over the past eight quarters, AFFILIATED MANAGERS GROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (5.5% CAGR vs -0.0%).
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) is an American financial services firm founded in 1993 and headquartered in West Palm Beach, Florida. The company's stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol AMG, and is listed on the S&P 400 for mid-size American firms.
Match Group, Inc. is an American internet and technology company headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It owns and operates the largest global portfolio of popular online dating services including Tinder, Match.com, Meetic, OkCupid, Hinge, Plenty of Fish, Azar, and other dating global brands. The company was owned by IAC until July 2020 when Match Group was spun off as a separate, public company. As of 2019, the company had 9.3 million subscribers, of which 4.6 million were in North America. Japan ...
AMG vs MTCH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $556.6M | $864.0M |
| Net Profit | $347.5M | $167.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.6% |
| Operating Margin | 94.4% | 27.4% |
| Net Margin | 62.4% | 19.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.2% | 4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 114.2% | 41.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $10.87 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $864.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $556.6M | $878.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $528.0M | $914.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $493.2M | $863.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $496.6M | $831.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $524.3M | $860.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $516.4M | $895.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.3M | $864.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $167.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $347.5M | $209.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.4M | $160.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.3M | $125.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.4M | $117.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.2M | $158.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $123.6M | $136.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.0M | $133.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 75.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 74.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 73.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 72.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 71.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 72.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 71.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 71.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 94.4% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.7% | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.8% | 22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.5% | 20.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.2% | 26.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.0% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | 23.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 62.4% | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.2% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.1% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.6% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.9% | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.2% | 15.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.87 | $0.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.87 | $0.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.80 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.20 | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.95 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.78 | $0.51 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.26 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $586.0M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | $3.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $-218.1M |
| Total Assets | $9.2B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.83× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $586.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $476.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $361.0M | $340.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $816.5M | $414.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $950.0M | $970.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $860.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $865.5M | $843.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $-218.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $-253.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $-223.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $-230.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $-182.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $-63.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $-88.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $-130.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.2B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.7B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.8B | $4.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.76× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $256.4M | $194.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $254.5M | $174.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 45.7% | 20.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.74× | 1.16× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $967.1M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $194.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $256.4M | $322.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $277.1M | $320.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.8M | $243.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $208.9M | $193.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $212.5M | $254.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.2M | $264.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $245.2M | $129.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $174.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $254.5M | $308.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $275.9M | $306.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $229.4M | $231.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $207.3M | $177.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.4M | $247.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $264.5M | $251.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $244.6M | $116.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 45.7% | 35.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.3% | 33.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.5% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.7% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.3% | 28.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.2% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.9% | 13.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 1.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.16× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | 1.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.30× | 1.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.74× | 1.94× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.89× | 1.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.31× | 1.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.15× | 1.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.23× | 0.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
