vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
American Homes 4 Rent is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($455.0M vs $359.9M, roughly 1.3× AdvanSix Inc.). American Homes 4 Rent runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs -0.8%, a 32.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AdvanSix Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs 4.2%). American Homes 4 Rent produced more free cash flow last quarter ($823.7M vs $36.1M). Over the past eight quarters, American Homes 4 Rent's revenue compounded faster (3.6% CAGR vs 3.4%).
American Homes 4 RentAMHEarnings & Financial Report
American Homes 4 Rent, doing business as AMH, is a real estate investment trust based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that invests in single-family rental homes. As of December 31, 2019, the company owned 52,552 homes in 22 states. Its largest concentrations are in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte, North Carolina.
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
AMH vs ASIX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $455.0M | $359.9M |
| Net Profit | $144.3M | $-2.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 7.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -0.7% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | -0.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 9.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.3% | -892.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $455.0M | $359.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $478.5M | $374.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.5M | $410.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $459.3M | $377.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.6M | $329.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.1M | $398.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.5M | $453.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $423.6M | $336.8M |
| Q4 25 | $144.3M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.6M | $31.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.7M | $23.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.9M | $352.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.5M | $38.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.1M | $-17.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | -0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | 6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.2% | -5.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $1.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.86 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $0.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $1.43 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | $-0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.5M | $19.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0B | $815.2M |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.6M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.4M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.5M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $718.4M | $12.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.8M | $20.6M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $815.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $818.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $823.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $794.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $774.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $766.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0B | $746.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0B | $713.2M |
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.8B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.64× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $864.3M | $63.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $823.7M | $36.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 181.0% | 10.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.9% | 7.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $6.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $864.3M | $63.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.3M | $26.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.9M | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.4M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $811.5M | $64.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $233.6M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.0M | $50.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.8M | $-36.2M |
| Q4 25 | $823.7M | $36.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.5M | $66.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.7M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.9M | $-22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $777.5M | $29.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.3M | $26.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.3M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.0M | $-71.6M |
| Q4 25 | 181.0% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.3% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | -6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 178.1% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.1% | -21.3% |
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 10.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.20× | 0.67× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | 0.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.64× | 182.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.67× | 2.57× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.52× | 1.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.58× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMH
Segment breakdown not available.
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
