vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CENTURY ALUMINUM CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($633.7M vs $455.0M, roughly 1.4× American Homes 4 Rent). American Homes 4 Rent runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs 0.3%, a 31.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, American Homes 4 Rent posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.2% vs 0.4%). American Homes 4 Rent produced more free cash flow last quarter ($823.7M vs $67.7M). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 3.6%).
American Homes 4 RentAMHEarnings & Financial Report
American Homes 4 Rent, doing business as AMH, is a real estate investment trust based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that invests in single-family rental homes. As of December 31, 2019, the company owned 52,552 homes in 22 states. Its largest concentrations are in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte, North Carolina.
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
AMH vs CENX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $455.0M | $633.7M |
| Net Profit | $144.3M | $1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 13.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.2% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | 0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.3% | -96.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $455.0M | $633.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $478.5M | $632.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.5M | $628.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $459.3M | $633.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.6M | $630.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.1M | $539.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.5M | $560.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $423.6M | $489.5M |
| Q4 25 | $144.3M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.6M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.7M | $29.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.9M | $45.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.5M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.1M | $246.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | -0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.2% | 50.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | $2.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.5M | $134.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0B | $805.6M |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $134.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.6M | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $40.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | $44.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.4M | $32.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $718.4M | $41.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.8M | $93.5M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $805.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $741.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $724.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $726.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $694.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $628.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0B | $601.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0B | $601.5M |
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.8B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.64× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $864.3M | $102.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $823.7M | $67.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 181.0% | 10.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.9% | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.99× | 57.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $84.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $864.3M | $102.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.3M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.9M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.4M | $72.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $811.5M | $-41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $233.6M | $20.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.0M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.8M | $-14.8M |
| Q4 25 | $823.7M | $67.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.5M | $-18.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.7M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.9M | $51.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $777.5M | $-54.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.3M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.3M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.0M | $-44.5M |
| Q4 25 | 181.0% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.8% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.3% | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 178.1% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.2% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.1% | -9.1% |
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.99× | 57.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.91× | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.20× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | 2.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.64× | -0.92× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.67× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.52× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.58× | -0.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMH
Segment breakdown not available.
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
