vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. (CRUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($580.6M vs $455.0M, roughly 1.3× American Homes 4 Rent). American Homes 4 Rent runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs 24.2%, a 7.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.5% vs 4.2%). American Homes 4 Rent produced more free cash flow last quarter ($823.7M vs $285.7M). Over the past eight quarters, CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.0% CAGR vs 3.6%).
American Homes 4 RentAMHEarnings & Financial Report
American Homes 4 Rent, doing business as AMH, is a real estate investment trust based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that invests in single-family rental homes. As of December 31, 2019, the company owned 52,552 homes in 22 states. Its largest concentrations are in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte, North Carolina.
Cirrus Logic Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor supplier that specializes in analog, mixed-signal, and audio DSP integrated circuits (ICs). Since 1998, the company's headquarters have been in Austin, Texas.
AMH vs CRUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $455.0M | $580.6M |
| Net Profit | $144.3M | $140.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 53.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 26.3% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | 24.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 4.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.3% | 21.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $2.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $455.0M | $580.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $478.5M | $561.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.5M | $407.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $459.3M | $424.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.6M | $555.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.1M | $541.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.5M | $374.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $423.6M | $371.8M |
| Q4 25 | $144.3M | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $131.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.6M | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.7M | $71.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.9M | $116.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $102.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.5M | $42.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.1M | $44.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 53.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 52.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 52.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 53.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 53.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 51.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.1% |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.2% | 12.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | $2.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | $2.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $1.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $1.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | $2.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $1.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $0.76 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | $0.78 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.5M | $778.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0B | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $778.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.6M | $593.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $548.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | $539.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.4M | $526.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.5M | $445.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $718.4M | $491.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.8M | $502.8M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.8B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.64× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $864.3M | $290.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $823.7M | $285.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 181.0% | 49.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.9% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.99× | 2.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $614.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $864.3M | $290.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.3M | $92.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.9M | $116.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.4M | $130.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $811.5M | $218.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $233.6M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.0M | $87.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.8M | $170.5M |
| Q4 25 | $823.7M | $285.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.5M | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.7M | $113.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.9M | $127.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $777.5M | $211.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.3M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.3M | $77.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.0M | $163.5M |
| Q4 25 | 181.0% | 49.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.8% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.3% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 178.1% | 38.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.2% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.1% | 44.0% |
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.99× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.91× | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.20× | 1.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | 1.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.64× | 1.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.67× | 0.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.52× | 2.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.58× | 3.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMH
Segment breakdown not available.
CRUS
| Audio Products Segment | $344.5M | 59% |
| High Performance Mixed Signal Products | $236.2M | 41% |
