vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
American Homes 4 Rent is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($455.0M vs $270.8M, roughly 1.7× HUTCHMED (China) Ltd). American Homes 4 Rent runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs 0.7%, a 31.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, American Homes 4 Rent posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.2% vs -16.5%). American Homes 4 Rent produced more free cash flow last quarter ($823.7M vs $3.4M).
American Homes 4 RentAMHEarnings & Financial Report
American Homes 4 Rent, doing business as AMH, is a real estate investment trust based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that invests in single-family rental homes. As of December 31, 2019, the company owned 52,552 homes in 22 states. Its largest concentrations are in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte, North Carolina.
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
AMH vs HCM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $455.0M | $270.8M |
| Net Profit | $144.3M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -13.2% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | -16.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.3% | -83.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $455.0M | $270.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $478.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.5M | $277.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $459.3M | $324.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.5M | $305.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $423.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $144.3M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.6M | $455.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.7M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.5M | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 163.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.5M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | $93.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | 0.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | $836.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $718.4M | $802.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $93.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $82.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $82.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $759.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0B | $740.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.69× | 0.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.64× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $864.3M | $8.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $823.7M | $3.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 181.0% | 1.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.9% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.99× | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $-96.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $864.3M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.9M | $-72.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.4M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $811.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $233.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.0M | $-39.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $823.7M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.7M | $-82.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.9M | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $777.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.3M | $-49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 181.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.3% | -29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 178.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.2% | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.99× | 4.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.20× | -0.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | 3.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.64× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.67× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.52× | -1.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.58× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
