vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $455.0M, roughly 1.2× American Homes 4 Rent). American Homes 4 Rent runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs 29.8%, a 1.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, American Homes 4 Rent posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.2% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs 3.6%).

American Homes 4 Rent, doing business as AMH, is a real estate investment trust based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that invests in single-family rental homes. As of December 31, 2019, the company owned 52,552 homes in 22 states. Its largest concentrations are in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte, North Carolina.

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

AMH vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.2× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$455.0M
AMH
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
AMH
AMH
+0.2% gap
AMH
4.2%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
AMH
AMH
1.9% more per $
AMH
31.7%
29.8%
KIM
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
5.6%
3.6%
AMH

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
AMH
AMH
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$455.0M
$558.0M
Net Profit
$144.3M
$166.3M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
37.2%
Net Margin
31.7%
29.8%
Revenue YoY
4.2%
4.0%
Net Profit YoY
0.3%
23.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.33
$0.46

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
AMH
AMH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$455.0M
$542.5M
Q3 25
$478.5M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$457.5M
$525.2M
Q1 25
$459.3M
$536.6M
Q4 24
$436.6M
$525.4M
Q3 24
$445.1M
$507.6M
Q2 24
$423.5M
$500.2M
Net Profit
AMH
AMH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$144.3M
$151.2M
Q3 25
$116.8M
$137.8M
Q2 25
$123.6M
$163.0M
Q1 25
$128.7M
$132.8M
Q4 24
$143.9M
$166.0M
Q3 24
$87.6M
$136.0M
Q2 24
$108.5M
$119.7M
Operating Margin
AMH
AMH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
Q3 25
34.9%
Q2 25
39.2%
Q1 25
33.6%
Q4 24
31.7%
Q3 24
33.7%
Q2 24
32.1%
Net Margin
AMH
AMH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
31.7%
27.9%
Q3 25
24.4%
25.7%
Q2 25
27.0%
31.0%
Q1 25
28.0%
24.8%
Q4 24
33.0%
31.6%
Q3 24
19.7%
26.8%
Q2 24
25.6%
23.9%
EPS (diluted)
AMH
AMH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$0.33
Q3 25
$0.27
Q2 25
$0.28
Q1 25
$0.30
Q4 24
$0.33
Q3 24
$0.20
Q2 24
$0.25

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
AMH
AMH
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$108.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$5.1B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$7.0B
$10.4B
Total Assets
$13.2B
$19.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.72×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
AMH
AMH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$108.5M
$211.6M
Q3 25
$45.6M
$159.3M
Q2 25
$323.3M
$226.6M
Q1 25
$69.7M
$131.3M
Q4 24
$199.4M
$688.6M
Q3 24
$162.5M
$789.0M
Q2 24
$718.4M
$126.4M
Total Debt
AMH
AMH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$5.1B
$7.7B
Q3 25
$4.8B
Q2 25
$5.2B
Q1 25
$4.9B
Q4 24
$5.0B
$8.0B
Q3 24
$4.5B
Q2 24
$5.0B
Stockholders' Equity
AMH
AMH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$7.0B
$10.4B
Q3 25
$7.2B
$10.5B
Q2 25
$7.2B
$10.5B
Q1 25
$7.2B
$10.6B
Q4 24
$7.2B
$10.7B
Q3 24
$7.0B
$10.5B
Q2 24
$7.0B
$10.6B
Total Assets
AMH
AMH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$13.2B
$19.7B
Q3 25
$13.3B
$19.9B
Q2 25
$13.6B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$13.3B
$19.7B
Q4 24
$13.4B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$12.8B
$20.1B
Q2 24
$13.3B
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
AMH
AMH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.72×
0.74×
Q3 25
0.68×
Q2 25
0.72×
Q1 25
0.69×
Q4 24
0.70×
0.75×
Q3 24
0.64×
Q2 24
0.71×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
AMH
AMH
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$864.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$823.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
181.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
8.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
5.99×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.5B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
AMH
AMH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$864.3M
$258.4M
Q3 25
$223.3M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$271.9M
$305.4M
Q1 25
$223.4M
$223.8M
Q4 24
$811.5M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$233.6M
$295.9M
Q2 24
$274.0M
$294.1M
Free Cash Flow
AMH
AMH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$823.7M
Q3 25
$214.5M
Q2 25
$257.7M
Q1 25
$215.9M
$205.4M
Q4 24
$777.5M
Q3 24
$225.3M
Q2 24
$263.3M
FCF Margin
AMH
AMH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
181.0%
Q3 25
44.8%
Q2 25
56.3%
Q1 25
47.0%
38.3%
Q4 24
178.1%
Q3 24
50.6%
Q2 24
62.2%
Capex Intensity
AMH
AMH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
8.9%
0.0%
Q3 25
1.8%
0.0%
Q2 25
3.1%
0.0%
Q1 25
1.6%
3.4%
Q4 24
7.8%
Q3 24
1.9%
Q2 24
2.5%
Cash Conversion
AMH
AMH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.99×
1.71×
Q3 25
1.91×
2.41×
Q2 25
2.20×
1.87×
Q1 25
1.74×
1.69×
Q4 24
5.64×
1.44×
Q3 24
2.67×
2.18×
Q2 24
2.52×
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

AMH
AMH

Segment breakdown not available.

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

Related Comparisons