vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and LITTELFUSE INC (LFUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LITTELFUSE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($593.9M vs $455.0M, roughly 1.3× American Homes 4 Rent). American Homes 4 Rent runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs -40.8%, a 72.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LITTELFUSE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.2% vs 4.2%). American Homes 4 Rent produced more free cash flow last quarter ($823.7M vs $119.7M). Over the past eight quarters, LITTELFUSE INC's revenue compounded faster (5.3% CAGR vs 3.6%).
American Homes 4 RentAMHEarnings & Financial Report
American Homes 4 Rent, doing business as AMH, is a real estate investment trust based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that invests in single-family rental homes. As of December 31, 2019, the company owned 52,552 homes in 22 states. Its largest concentrations are in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte, North Carolina.
Littelfuse is a leading global manufacturer of circuit protection, sensing, and control components. Its product portfolio includes fuses, semiconductor protection devices, power switches, sensors, and circuit breakers, serving automotive, industrial electronics, consumer electronics, telecommunications, and renewable energy sectors worldwide to boost equipment safety and reliability.
AMH vs LFUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $455.0M | $593.9M |
| Net Profit | $144.3M | $-242.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -37.5% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | -40.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.3% | -367.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $-9.71 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $455.0M | $593.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $478.5M | $624.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.5M | $613.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $459.3M | $554.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.6M | $529.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.1M | $567.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.5M | $558.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $423.6M | $535.4M |
| Q4 25 | $144.3M | $-242.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.6M | $57.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.7M | $43.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.9M | $-51.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $58.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.5M | $45.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.1M | $48.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -37.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | -40.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | -9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.2% | 9.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | $-9.71 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | $2.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $1.75 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | $-2.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $2.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $1.82 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | $1.93 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.5M | $563.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | $802.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | 0.33× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $563.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.6M | $815.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $685.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | $619.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.4M | $725.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.5M | $630.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $718.4M | $562.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.8M | $562.4M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $802.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $805.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $810.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $805.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $856.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $867.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $863.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | $866.7M |
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.8B | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.68× | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.69× | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | 0.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.64× | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $864.3M | $138.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $823.7M | $119.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 181.0% | 20.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.9% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $366.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $864.3M | $138.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.3M | $146.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.9M | $82.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.4M | $65.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $811.5M | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $233.6M | $80.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.0M | $69.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.8M | $57.1M |
| Q4 25 | $823.7M | $119.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.5M | $131.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.7M | $72.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.9M | $42.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $777.5M | $134.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.3M | $65.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.3M | $50.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.0M | $41.6M |
| Q4 25 | 181.0% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.8% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.3% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 178.1% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.1% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.91× | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.20× | 1.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | 1.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.64× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.67× | 1.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.52× | 1.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.58× | 1.18× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMH
Segment breakdown not available.
LFUS
| Electronics Passive Products And Sensors | $174.9M | 29% |
| Electronics Semiconductor | $170.3M | 29% |
| Industrial Products | $85.0M | 14% |
| Commercial Vehicle Products | $76.2M | 13% |
| Passenger Car Products | $72.8M | 12% |
| Automotive Sensors | $14.7M | 2% |
| Dortmund Fab | $12.5M | 2% |
