vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and Legence Corp. (LGN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Legence Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($708.0M vs $455.0M, roughly 1.6× American Homes 4 Rent). American Homes 4 Rent runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs -0.1%, a 31.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Legence Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.2% vs 4.2%). American Homes 4 Rent produced more free cash flow last quarter ($823.7M vs $137.4M).
American Homes 4 RentAMHEarnings & Financial Report
American Homes 4 Rent, doing business as AMH, is a real estate investment trust based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that invests in single-family rental homes. As of December 31, 2019, the company owned 52,552 homes in 22 states. Its largest concentrations are in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte, North Carolina.
Legence Corp is a leading sustainable building and decarbonization solution provider. It delivers energy efficiency optimization, building automation design, renewable energy integration, and low-carbon retrofit services for commercial, industrial, and institutional clients, with core operations across North America to help customers cut costs and reduce carbon footprints.
AMH vs LGN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $455.0M | $708.0M |
| Net Profit | $144.3M | $-576.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 20.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.3% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | -0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 26.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.3% | 46.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $455.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $478.5M | $708.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $459.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.1M | $560.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $423.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $144.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $-576.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | -0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.5M | $176.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | $812.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0B | $387.9M |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | 2.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.6M | $176.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $718.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $812.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $387.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.68× | 2.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.64× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $864.3M | $162.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $823.7M | $137.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 181.0% | 19.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.9% | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $864.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.3M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $811.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $233.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $823.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.5M | $137.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $777.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 181.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.8% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 178.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.20× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.64× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.67× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.52× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.58× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMH
Segment breakdown not available.
LGN
| Installation And Fabrication | $408.7M | 58% |
| Engineering And Design | $110.9M | 16% |
| Program And Project Management | $101.2M | 14% |
| Maintenance And Service | $87.1M | 12% |
