vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and Enpro Inc. (NPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
American Homes 4 Rent is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($455.0M vs $295.4M, roughly 1.5× Enpro Inc.). American Homes 4 Rent runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs -10.8%, a 42.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Enpro Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.3% vs 4.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Enpro Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs 3.6%).
American Homes 4 RentAMHEarnings & Financial Report
American Homes 4 Rent, doing business as AMH, is a real estate investment trust based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that invests in single-family rental homes. As of December 31, 2019, the company owned 52,552 homes in 22 states. Its largest concentrations are in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte, North Carolina.
Enpro is a US-based industrial technology company that designs and manufactures products and materials for technology-intensive sectors. The company serves industries such as semiconductors, aerospace, power generation, heavy-duty trucking, agricultural machinery, chemical processing, pulp and paper, and life sciences from 61 primary manufacturing facilities located in 12 countries, worldwide. It is organized under three segments: Sealing Technologies, Advanced Surface Technologies, and Engin...
AMH vs NPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $455.0M | $295.4M |
| Net Profit | $144.3M | $-32.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 42.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 11.2% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 14.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.3% | -330.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $-1.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $455.0M | $295.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $478.5M | $286.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.5M | $288.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $459.3M | $273.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.6M | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.1M | $260.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.5M | $271.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $423.6M | $257.5M |
| Q4 25 | $144.3M | $-32.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.6M | $26.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.7M | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.9M | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.5M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.1M | $12.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 41.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.9% |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.2% | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | $-1.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $1.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $1.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | $0.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $1.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.5M | $114.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | $655.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $114.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.6M | $132.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $107.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | $240.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.4M | $236.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.5M | $206.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $718.4M | $175.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.8M | $163.9M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $655.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $640.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | $644.9M |
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.8B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | 0.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.64× | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $864.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $823.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 181.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.9% | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $864.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.3M | $65.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.9M | $52.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.4M | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $811.5M | $59.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $233.6M | $54.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.0M | $43.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.8M | $6.3M |
| Q4 25 | $823.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.5M | $53.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.7M | $42.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.9M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $777.5M | $49.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.3M | $48.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.3M | $38.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.0M | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | 181.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.8% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.3% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 178.1% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.2% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.1% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 5.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.91× | 3.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.20× | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.64× | 4.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.67× | 2.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.52× | 1.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.58× | 0.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMH
Segment breakdown not available.
NPO
| Sealing Technologies Segment | $187.0M | 63% |
| General Industrial | $71.3M | 24% |
| Power Generation | $19.9M | 7% |
| Oiland Gas Market | $15.0M | 5% |
| Semiconductors | $2.2M | 1% |
