vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and SYNAPTICS Inc (SYNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
American Homes 4 Rent is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($455.0M vs $302.5M, roughly 1.5× SYNAPTICS Inc). American Homes 4 Rent runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs -4.9%, a 36.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SYNAPTICS Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.2% vs 4.2%). American Homes 4 Rent produced more free cash flow last quarter ($823.7M vs $18.2M). Over the past eight quarters, SYNAPTICS Inc's revenue compounded faster (12.9% CAGR vs 3.6%).
American Homes 4 RentAMHEarnings & Financial Report
American Homes 4 Rent, doing business as AMH, is a real estate investment trust based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that invests in single-family rental homes. As of December 31, 2019, the company owned 52,552 homes in 22 states. Its largest concentrations are in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte, North Carolina.
Synaptics, Inc. is an American neural network technologies and computer-to-human interface devices development company based in San Jose, California. It develops touchpads and fingerprint biometrics technology for computer laptops; touch, display driver, and fingerprint biometrics technology for smartphones; and touch, video and far-field voice, low-power AI processors, and wireless technology for smart home devices, wearables, and automobiles. Synaptics sells its products to original equipme...
AMH vs SYNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $455.0M | $302.5M |
| Net Profit | $144.3M | $-14.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | -5.0% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | -4.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.3% | -922.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $455.0M | $302.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $478.5M | $292.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.5M | $282.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $459.3M | $266.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.6M | $267.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.1M | $257.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.5M | $247.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $423.6M | $237.3M |
| Q4 25 | $144.3M | $-14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.6M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.7M | $-21.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.9M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.5M | $208.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.1M | $-18.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 46.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | -7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | -9.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | 84.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.2% | -7.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $-0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $5.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | $-0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.5M | $437.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | $836.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | 0.60× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $437.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.6M | $459.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $452.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | $421.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.4M | $596.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.5M | $853.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $718.4M | $876.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.8M | $828.6M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $836.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $835.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $834.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $834.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $832.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $983.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.8B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.68× | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.69× | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | 0.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.64× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $864.3M | $29.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $823.7M | $18.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 181.0% | 6.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.9% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $154.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $864.3M | $29.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.3M | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.9M | $57.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.4M | $73.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $811.5M | $22.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $233.6M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.0M | $65.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.8M | $-13.7M |
| Q4 25 | $823.7M | $18.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.5M | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.7M | $50.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.9M | $68.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $777.5M | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.3M | $-20.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.3M | $57.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.0M | $-22.7M |
| Q4 25 | 181.0% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.8% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.3% | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | 25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 178.1% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.2% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.1% | -9.6% |
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 3.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.20× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.64× | 12.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.67× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.52× | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.58× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMH
Segment breakdown not available.
SYNA
| Enterprise And Automotive Product Applications | $161.1M | 53% |
| Internet Of Things Product Applications | $93.2M | 31% |
| Mobile Product Applications | $48.2M | 16% |
