vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
American Homes 4 Rent is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($455.0M vs $245.3M, roughly 1.9× Tecnoglass Inc.). American Homes 4 Rent runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs 10.6%, a 21.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, American Homes 4 Rent posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.2% vs 2.4%). American Homes 4 Rent produced more free cash flow last quarter ($823.7M vs $11.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Tecnoglass Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs 3.6%).
American Homes 4 RentAMHEarnings & Financial Report
American Homes 4 Rent, doing business as AMH, is a real estate investment trust based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that invests in single-family rental homes. As of December 31, 2019, the company owned 52,552 homes in 22 states. Its largest concentrations are in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte, North Carolina.
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
AMH vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $455.0M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | $144.3M | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.3% | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $455.0M | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $478.5M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.5M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $459.3M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.6M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.1M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.5M | $219.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $423.6M | $192.6M |
| Q4 25 | $144.3M | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.6M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.7M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.9M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.5M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.1M | $29.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.3% |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.2% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | $0.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.5M | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0B | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.6M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.4M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.5M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $718.4M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.8M | $138.8M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $144.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | $160.9M |
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0B | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0B | $573.6M |
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3B | $942.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.8B | $981.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.68× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.69× | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.64× | 0.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $864.3M | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $823.7M | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 181.0% | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.9% | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.99× | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $864.3M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.3M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.9M | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.4M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $811.5M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $233.6M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.0M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.8M | $33.4M |
| Q4 25 | $823.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.5M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.7M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.9M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $777.5M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.3M | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.3M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.0M | $23.6M |
| Q4 25 | 181.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.8% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.3% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 178.1% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.1% | 12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.99× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.91× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.20× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.64× | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.67× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.52× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.58× | 1.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMH
Segment breakdown not available.
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |
