vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and TRIMAS CORP (TRS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
American Homes 4 Rent is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($455.0M vs $256.5M, roughly 1.8× TRIMAS CORP). TRIMAS CORP runs the higher net margin — 31.9% vs 31.7%, a 0.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, American Homes 4 Rent posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.2% vs 3.8%). American Homes 4 Rent produced more free cash flow last quarter ($823.7M vs $36.8M). Over the past eight quarters, American Homes 4 Rent's revenue compounded faster (3.6% CAGR vs 3.3%).
American Homes 4 RentAMHEarnings & Financial Report
American Homes 4 Rent, doing business as AMH, is a real estate investment trust based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that invests in single-family rental homes. As of December 31, 2019, the company owned 52,552 homes in 22 states. Its largest concentrations are in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte, North Carolina.
Trimas Corp is a diversified industrial manufacturing enterprise that designs, produces and distributes a wide portfolio of engineered products, including specialized fasteners, aerospace components, custom packaging solutions, and consumer & industrial hardware. It primarily serves aerospace, automotive, construction, consumer goods and industrial sectors, with core operations across North America and selected global markets.
AMH vs TRS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $455.0M | $256.5M |
| Net Profit | $144.3M | $81.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.7% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | 31.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 3.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.3% | 236.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $2.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $256.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $455.0M | $-140.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $478.5M | $269.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.5M | $274.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $459.3M | $241.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.6M | $-66.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.1M | $229.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.5M | $240.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $81.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $144.3M | $81.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.6M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.7M | $12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.9M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.5M | $10.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | -58.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | -8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.03 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | $2.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.5M | $30.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0B | $705.6M |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $30.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.6M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $30.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | $32.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.4M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.5M | $26.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $718.4M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $469.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $407.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $424.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $434.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $398.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $409.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $427.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $705.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $705.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $725.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $715.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $686.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $667.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $682.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0B | $675.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.68× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | 0.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.69× | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | 0.63× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $864.3M | $117.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $823.7M | $36.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 181.0% | 14.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.9% | 18.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.99× | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $109.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $117.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $864.3M | $41.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.3M | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.9M | $30.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.4M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $811.5M | $27.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $233.6M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.0M | $18.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $823.7M | $36.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.5M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.7M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.9M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $777.5M | $12.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.3M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.3M | $7.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 181.0% | -26.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.8% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | -1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 178.1% | -18.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.2% | 3.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 18.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | -22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.99× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.91× | 3.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.20× | 1.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.64× | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.67× | 8.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.52× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
