vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
American Homes 4 Rent is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($455.0M vs $425.3M, roughly 1.1× Verisign). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 31.7%, a 16.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Verisign posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs 4.2%). American Homes 4 Rent produced more free cash flow last quarter ($823.7M vs $285.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Verisign's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs 3.6%).
American Homes 4 RentAMHEarnings & Financial Report
American Homes 4 Rent, doing business as AMH, is a real estate investment trust based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that invests in single-family rental homes. As of December 31, 2019, the company owned 52,552 homes in 22 states. Its largest concentrations are in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte, North Carolina.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
AMH vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $455.0M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $144.3M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.3% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $455.0M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $478.5M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.5M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $459.3M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.6M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.1M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.5M | $387.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $423.6M | $384.3M |
| Q4 25 | $144.3M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.6M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.7M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.9M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.5M | $198.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.1M | $194.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 87.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 68.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 67.4% |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.2% | 50.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.5M | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0B | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.6M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.4M | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.5M | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $718.4M | $689.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.8M | $924.7M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0B | $-1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0B | $-1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.8B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.64× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $864.3M | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $823.7M | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 181.0% | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.9% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.99× | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $864.3M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.3M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.9M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.4M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $811.5M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $233.6M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.0M | $160.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.8M | $257.3M |
| Q4 25 | $823.7M | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.5M | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.7M | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.9M | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $777.5M | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.3M | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.3M | $151.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.0M | $253.5M |
| Q4 25 | 181.0% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.8% | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.3% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 178.1% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.2% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.1% | 66.0% |
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.99× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.91× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.20× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.64× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.67× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.52× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.58× | 1.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
