vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLYMPIC STEEL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($490.7M vs $455.0M, roughly 1.1× American Homes 4 Rent). American Homes 4 Rent runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs 0.4%, a 31.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OLYMPIC STEEL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.4% vs 4.2%). American Homes 4 Rent produced more free cash flow last quarter ($823.7M vs $-12.9M). Over the past eight quarters, American Homes 4 Rent's revenue compounded faster (3.6% CAGR vs 0.1%).
American Homes 4 RentAMHEarnings & Financial Report
American Homes 4 Rent, doing business as AMH, is a real estate investment trust based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that invests in single-family rental homes. As of December 31, 2019, the company owned 52,552 homes in 22 states. Its largest concentrations are in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte, North Carolina.
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
AMH vs ZEUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $455.0M | $490.7M |
| Net Profit | $144.3M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.3% | -21.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $455.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $478.5M | $490.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.5M | $496.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $459.3M | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.6M | $418.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.1M | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.5M | $526.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $423.6M | $526.6M |
| Q4 25 | $144.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.6M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.7M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.9M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.5M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.1M | $8.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.2% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.5M | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | $240.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0B | $579.1M |
| Total Assets | $13.2B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.6M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.3M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.4M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.5M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $718.4M | $9.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.8M | $10.3M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $233.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $235.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $272.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $209.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | $196.8M |
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $579.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $578.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $574.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $573.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $570.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0B | $569.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0B | $563.0M |
| Q4 25 | $13.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.8B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.68× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.69× | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.64× | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $864.3M | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $823.7M | $-12.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 181.0% | -2.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.9% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.99× | -2.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $864.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.3M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.9M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.4M | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $811.5M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $233.6M | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.0M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.8M | $-2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $823.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $214.5M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.7M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.9M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $777.5M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.3M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.3M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.0M | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | 181.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.8% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 178.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.2% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.1% | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.91× | -2.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.20× | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.74× | 19.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.64× | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.67× | 9.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.52× | -0.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.58× | -0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMH
Segment breakdown not available.
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |
