vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC (AMN) and CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($748.2M vs $633.7M, roughly 1.2× CENTURY ALUMINUM CO). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO runs the higher net margin — 0.3% vs -1.0%, a 1.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.8% vs 0.4%). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($67.7M vs $67.6M). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs -4.5%).
AMN Healthcare Services Inc. is a leading US healthcare sector workforce solutions and staffing provider. It offers temporary and permanent placement for nurses, physicians, allied health and other clinical/non-clinical staff, plus workforce management tools and consulting for hospitals, clinics and other medical facilities.
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
AMN vs CENX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $748.2M | $633.7M |
| Net Profit | $-7.7M | $1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | 13.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 5.2% |
| Net Margin | -1.0% | 0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.8% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 95.9% | -96.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.19 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $748.2M | $633.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.5M | $632.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $658.2M | $628.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.5M | $633.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $734.7M | $630.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $687.5M | $539.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $740.7M | $560.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $820.9M | $489.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.7M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.3M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-116.2M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | $29.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-187.5M | $45.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.3M | $246.8M |
| Q4 25 | 26.1% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.8% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.7% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.8% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.4% | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | -1.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.7% | -0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | 50.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.76 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.02 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.90 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.18 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.45 | $2.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | $134.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $767.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $642.1M | $805.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.19× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | $134.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.6M | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.5M | $40.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.8M | $44.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6M | $32.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.0M | $41.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.6M | $93.5M |
| Q4 25 | $767.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $642.1M | $805.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.4M | $741.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $607.6M | $724.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $715.1M | $726.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $706.6M | $694.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $890.7M | $628.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $876.9M | $601.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $854.2M | $601.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.6M | $102.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.6M | $67.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.0% | 10.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 57.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $233.8M | $84.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.6M | $102.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.7M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.5M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.7M | $72.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.8M | $-41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.7M | $20.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.5M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.4M | $-14.8M |
| Q4 25 | $67.6M | $67.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.8M | $-18.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.7M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.7M | $51.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.6M | $-54.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.4M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.2M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.2M | $-44.5M |
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.4% | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | -9.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 57.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.77× | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.92× | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.54× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.13× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.70× | -0.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMN
| Travel Nurse Staffing | $208.3M | 28% |
| Allied Staffing | $146.9M | 20% |
| Labor Disruption Services | $124.3M | 17% |
| Technology And Workforce Solutions | $88.0M | 12% |
| Language Services | $69.9M | 9% |
| Other | $29.6M | 4% |
| International Nurse Staffing | $29.6M | 4% |
| Interim Leadership Staffing | $24.1M | 3% |
| Vendor Management Systems | $16.3M | 2% |
| Local Staffing | $8.6M | 1% |
| International Nurse Permanent Placement | $2.6M | 0% |
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
