vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC (AMN) and Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($748.2M vs $420.0M, roughly 1.8× Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.). Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.0% vs -1.0%, a 58.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs 1.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.0% CAGR vs -4.5%).
AMN Healthcare Services Inc. is a leading US healthcare sector workforce solutions and staffing provider. It offers temporary and permanent placement for nurses, physicians, allied health and other clinical/non-clinical staff, plus workforce management tools and consulting for hospitals, clinics and other medical facilities.
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in casino properties, based in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania. It was formed in November 2013 as a corporate spin-off from Penn National Gaming. The company owns 62 casino properties, all of which are leased to other companies.
AMN vs GLPI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $748.2M | $420.0M |
| Net Profit | $-7.7M | $239.4M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 79.4% |
| Net Margin | -1.0% | 57.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.8% | 6.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 95.9% | 40.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.19 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $420.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $748.2M | $407.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.5M | $397.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $658.2M | $394.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $689.5M | $395.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $734.7M | $389.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $687.5M | $385.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $740.7M | $380.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $239.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-7.7M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.3M | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-116.2M | $151.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | $165.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-187.5M | $223.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0M | $184.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2M | $208.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 79.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 89.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.8% | 61.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 65.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | 79.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 70.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 77.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 57.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.0% | 67.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.7% | 38.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 41.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.5% | 57.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 54.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.76 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.02 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.90 | $0.79 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.18 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | $274.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $767.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $642.1M | $5.0B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $13.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.19× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $274.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6M | $560.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | $560.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.0M | $560.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $767.1M | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $642.1M | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.4M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $607.6M | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $715.1M | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $706.6M | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $890.7M | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $876.9M | $4.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $12.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $12.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $12.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $12.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $12.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $11.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.19× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | 1.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.60× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $233.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $75.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.7M | $240.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.5M | $293.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.7M | $252.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.7M | $270.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.5M | $252.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $67.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.8M | $183.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.7M | $272.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.7M | $239.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.4M | $261.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.2M | $245.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.4% | 69.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 275.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 64.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.77× | 1.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.94× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.54× | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.13× | 1.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMN
| Travel Nurse Staffing | $208.3M | 28% |
| Allied Staffing | $146.9M | 20% |
| Labor Disruption Services | $124.3M | 17% |
| Technology And Workforce Solutions | $88.0M | 12% |
| Language Services | $69.9M | 9% |
| Other | $29.6M | 4% |
| International Nurse Staffing | $29.6M | 4% |
| Interim Leadership Staffing | $24.1M | 3% |
| Vendor Management Systems | $16.3M | 2% |
| Local Staffing | $8.6M | 1% |
| International Nurse Permanent Placement | $2.6M | 0% |
GLPI
Segment breakdown not available.