vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ameriprise Financial (AMP) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ameriprise Financial is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.9B vs $4.8B, roughly 1.0× Vistra Corp.). Ameriprise Financial runs the higher net margin — 18.7% vs 4.8%, a 13.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vistra Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Vistra Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (23.3% CAGR vs 5.5%).
Ameriprise Financial, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides various financial products and services to individual and institutional clients in the United States and internationally. It operates through four segments: Advice & Wealth Management, Asset Management, Retirement & Protection Solutions, and Corporate & Other. The Advice & Wealth Management segment provides financial planning and advice; brokerage products and services for retail and institutional clients; discretionary and non-di...
Vistra may refer to either of two companies:Vistra, a corporate services company based in Hong Kong Vistra Corp, an energy company based in Texas
AMP vs VST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.9B | $4.8B |
| Net Profit | $915.0M | $233.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 9.9% |
| Net Margin | 18.7% | 4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | 31.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 57.0% | -47.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | $915.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $233.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $912.0M | $652.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $327.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $583.0M | $-268.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $441.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $511.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $829.0M | $365.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.6% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.0% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.1% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | -2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.1% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 59.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 22.5% |
| Q1 26 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | -6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | 10.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.39 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.33 | $1.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.73 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.83 | $-0.93 | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.57 | $1.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.00 | $5.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.02 | $0.90 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.3B | $785.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.3B | $15.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $355.9B | $5.1B |
| Total Assets | $184.4B | $41.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | 3.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $785.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $602.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $458.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $561.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $905.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.9B |
| Q1 26 | $355.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $5.6B |
| Q1 26 | $184.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $190.9B | $41.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.1B | $38.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $184.9B | $38.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $179.1B | $38.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $181.4B | $37.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $186.0B | $37.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $179.7B | $39.1B |
| Q1 26 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.49× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $596.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 12.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 17.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $572.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $599.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $596.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $-118.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $-169.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $325.0M | $923.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $698.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 52.0% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.1% | 21.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.4% | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.8% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 65.8% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.8% | 19.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 13.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.65× | 6.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.42× | 2.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.66× | 1.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.89× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | 3.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.96× | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.07× | 3.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMP
| Management and financial advice fees | $2.9B | 60% |
| Other | $872.0M | 18% |
| Distribution fees | $563.0M | 12% |
| Premiums, policy and contract charges | $341.0M | 7% |
| Other revenues | $166.0M | 3% |
VST
| Retail Energy Charge In ERCOT | $2.1B | 43% |
| Retail Energy Charge In Northeast Midwest | $1.2B | 24% |
| East Segment | $1.1B | 24% |
| Hedging Revenue Realized | $170.0M | 4% |
| Revenue From Other Wholesale Contracts | $116.0M | 2% |
| Transferable Production Tax Credit Revenues | $78.0M | 2% |
| West Segment | $77.0M | 2% |
| Intersegment Sales | $25.0M | 1% |
