vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Birkenstock Holding plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($526.3M vs $519.1M, roughly 1.0× Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.). Birkenstock Holding plc runs the higher net margin — 19.3% vs -3.3%, a 22.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Birkenstock Holding plc's revenue compounded faster (26.8% CAGR vs -22.4%).

Alpha Metallurgical Resources, formerly Contura Energy, is a leading coal supplier with underground and surface coal mining complexes across Northern and Central Appalachia. Contura owns large coal basins in Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia which supply both metallurgical coal to produce steel and thermal coal to generate power.

Birkenstock Holding plc is a German shoe manufacturer known for its sandals and other shoes notable for contoured cork footbeds (soles), made with layers of suede and jute, which conform to the shape of their wearers' feet. Founded in 1774 by Johann Adam Birkenstock and headquartered in Neustadt (Wied), Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, the company's original purpose was to create shoes that support and contour the foot, compared to the flat soles of many shoes during that time. In 1896, the Fus...

AMR vs BIRK — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
BIRK
BIRK
1.0× larger
BIRK
$526.3M
$519.1M
AMR
Higher net margin
BIRK
BIRK
22.6% more per $
BIRK
19.3%
-3.3%
AMR
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
BIRK
BIRK
Annualised
BIRK
26.8%
-22.4%
AMR

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
AMR
AMR
BIRK
BIRK
Revenue
$519.1M
$526.3M
Net Profit
$-17.3M
$101.4M
Gross Margin
62.8%
Operating Margin
-4.1%
23.0%
Net Margin
-3.3%
19.3%
Revenue YoY
-15.7%
Net Profit YoY
-711.2%
EPS (diluted)
$-1.35

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
AMR
AMR
BIRK
BIRK
Q4 25
$519.1M
Q3 25
$525.2M
$526.3M
Q2 25
$548.7M
$685.8M
Q1 25
$529.7M
$620.3M
Q4 24
$615.4M
$390.7M
Q3 24
$669.8M
$455.8M
Q2 24
$800.1M
$609.9M
Q1 24
$861.3M
$519.7M
Net Profit
AMR
AMR
BIRK
BIRK
Q4 25
$-17.3M
Q3 25
$-5.5M
$101.4M
Q2 25
$-5.0M
$139.6M
Q1 25
$-33.9M
$113.5M
Q4 24
$-2.1M
$21.7M
Q3 24
$3.8M
Q2 24
$58.9M
$80.6M
Q1 24
$127.0M
$77.4M
Gross Margin
AMR
AMR
BIRK
BIRK
Q4 25
Q3 25
62.8%
Q2 25
60.5%
Q1 25
57.7%
Q4 24
60.3%
Q3 24
Q2 24
59.5%
Q1 24
56.3%
Operating Margin
AMR
AMR
BIRK
BIRK
Q4 25
-4.1%
Q3 25
-0.5%
23.0%
Q2 25
0.5%
31.2%
Q1 25
-7.6%
30.5%
Q4 24
1.6%
17.7%
Q3 24
0.8%
Q2 24
8.8%
27.5%
Q1 24
16.5%
27.5%
Net Margin
AMR
AMR
BIRK
BIRK
Q4 25
-3.3%
Q3 25
-1.1%
19.3%
Q2 25
-0.9%
20.3%
Q1 25
-6.4%
18.3%
Q4 24
-0.3%
5.6%
Q3 24
0.6%
Q2 24
7.4%
13.2%
Q1 24
14.7%
14.9%
EPS (diluted)
AMR
AMR
BIRK
BIRK
Q4 25
$-1.35
Q3 25
$-0.42
Q2 25
$-0.38
Q1 25
$-2.60
Q4 24
$-0.09
Q3 24
$0.29
Q2 24
$4.49
Q1 24
$9.59

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
AMR
AMR
BIRK
BIRK
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$415.6M
$355.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$9.8M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.5B
$2.9B
Total Assets
$2.3B
$5.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.01×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
AMR
AMR
BIRK
BIRK
Q4 25
$415.6M
Q3 25
$457.9M
$355.4M
Q2 25
$449.0M
$282.8M
Q1 25
$448.0M
$254.2M
Q4 24
$481.6M
$322.5M
Q3 24
$484.6M
$384.3M
Q2 24
$336.1M
$436.7M
Q1 24
$269.4M
$189.8M
Total Debt
AMR
AMR
BIRK
BIRK
Q4 25
$9.8M
Q3 25
$2.9M
Q2 25
$3.1M
Q1 25
$2.4M
Q4 24
$2.9M
Q3 24
$3.6M
Q2 24
$5.3M
Q1 24
$6.0M
Stockholders' Equity
AMR
AMR
BIRK
BIRK
Q4 25
$1.5B
Q3 25
$1.6B
$2.9B
Q2 25
$1.6B
$2.8B
Q1 25
$1.6B
$3.0B
Q4 24
$1.6B
$3.0B
Q3 24
$1.7B
$2.8B
Q2 24
$1.6B
$2.8B
Q1 24
$1.6B
$2.7B
Total Assets
AMR
AMR
BIRK
BIRK
Q4 25
$2.3B
Q3 25
$2.3B
$5.3B
Q2 25
$2.4B
$5.3B
Q1 25
$2.4B
$5.4B
Q4 24
$2.4B
$5.4B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$5.3B
Q2 24
$2.5B
$5.4B
Q1 24
$2.5B
$5.2B
Debt / Equity
AMR
AMR
BIRK
BIRK
Q4 25
0.01×
Q3 25
0.00×
Q2 25
0.00×
Q1 25
0.00×
Q4 24
0.00×
Q3 24
0.00×
Q2 24
0.00×
Q1 24
0.00×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
AMR
AMR
BIRK
BIRK
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$19.0M
$415.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-10.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-1.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
5.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.09×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$17.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
AMR
AMR
BIRK
BIRK
Q4 25
$19.0M
Q3 25
$50.5M
$415.0M
Q2 25
$53.2M
Q1 25
$22.2M
Q4 24
$56.3M
$-12.6M
Q3 24
$189.5M
$463.0M
Q2 24
$138.1M
Q1 24
$196.1M
Free Cash Flow
AMR
AMR
BIRK
BIRK
Q4 25
$-10.0M
Q3 25
$25.4M
Q2 25
$18.6M
Q1 25
$-16.3M
Q4 24
$13.6M
Q3 24
$158.0M
Q2 24
$77.0M
Q1 24
$132.5M
FCF Margin
AMR
AMR
BIRK
BIRK
Q4 25
-1.9%
Q3 25
4.8%
Q2 25
3.4%
Q1 25
-3.1%
Q4 24
2.2%
Q3 24
23.6%
Q2 24
9.6%
Q1 24
15.4%
Capex Intensity
AMR
AMR
BIRK
BIRK
Q4 25
5.6%
Q3 25
4.8%
Q2 25
6.3%
Q1 25
7.3%
Q4 24
6.9%
Q3 24
4.7%
Q2 24
7.6%
Q1 24
7.4%
Cash Conversion
AMR
AMR
BIRK
BIRK
Q4 25
Q3 25
4.09×
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
-0.58×
Q3 24
49.81×
Q2 24
2.34×
Q1 24
1.54×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons