vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and BLACK HILLS CORP (BKH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

BLACK HILLS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($622.7M vs $519.1M, roughly 1.2× Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.). BLACK HILLS CORP runs the higher net margin — 16.8% vs -3.3%, a 20.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BLACK HILLS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.4% vs -15.7%). Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-10.0M vs $-101.5M). Over the past eight quarters, BLACK HILLS CORP's revenue compounded faster (-6.8% CAGR vs -22.4%).

Alpha Metallurgical Resources, formerly Contura Energy, is a leading coal supplier with underground and surface coal mining complexes across Northern and Central Appalachia. Contura owns large coal basins in Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia which supply both metallurgical coal to produce steel and thermal coal to generate power.

Black Hills Corporation is an American diversified energy company that is an electric and gas utility in South Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Arkansas, Kansas, Nebraska, and Iowa. The company sells power throughout the American West. The company is based in Rapid City, South Dakota. It derives its name from its home in the Black Hills of South Dakota.

AMR vs BKH — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
BKH
BKH
1.2× larger
BKH
$622.7M
$519.1M
AMR
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
BKH
BKH
+22.1% gap
BKH
6.4%
-15.7%
AMR
Higher net margin
BKH
BKH
20.2% more per $
BKH
16.8%
-3.3%
AMR
More free cash flow
AMR
AMR
$91.5M more FCF
AMR
$-10.0M
$-101.5M
BKH
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
BKH
BKH
Annualised
BKH
-6.8%
-22.4%
AMR

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
AMR
AMR
BKH
BKH
Revenue
$519.1M
$622.7M
Net Profit
$-17.3M
$104.9M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-4.1%
27.5%
Net Margin
-3.3%
16.8%
Revenue YoY
-15.7%
6.4%
Net Profit YoY
-711.2%
7.0%
EPS (diluted)
$-1.35
$1.39

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
AMR
AMR
BKH
BKH
Q4 25
$519.1M
$622.7M
Q3 25
$525.2M
$427.4M
Q2 25
$548.7M
$435.7M
Q1 25
$529.7M
$800.4M
Q4 24
$615.4M
$585.1M
Q3 24
$669.8M
$398.6M
Q2 24
$800.1M
$397.1M
Q1 24
$861.3M
$717.2M
Net Profit
AMR
AMR
BKH
BKH
Q4 25
$-17.3M
$104.9M
Q3 25
$-5.5M
$24.9M
Q2 25
$-5.0M
$27.5M
Q1 25
$-33.9M
$134.3M
Q4 24
$-2.1M
$98.0M
Q3 24
$3.8M
$24.4M
Q2 24
$58.9M
$22.8M
Q1 24
$127.0M
$127.9M
Operating Margin
AMR
AMR
BKH
BKH
Q4 25
-4.1%
27.5%
Q3 25
-0.5%
18.4%
Q2 25
0.5%
18.9%
Q1 25
-7.6%
25.6%
Q4 24
1.6%
27.9%
Q3 24
0.8%
19.0%
Q2 24
8.8%
17.8%
Q1 24
16.5%
27.0%
Net Margin
AMR
AMR
BKH
BKH
Q4 25
-3.3%
16.8%
Q3 25
-1.1%
5.8%
Q2 25
-0.9%
6.3%
Q1 25
-6.4%
16.8%
Q4 24
-0.3%
16.7%
Q3 24
0.6%
6.1%
Q2 24
7.4%
5.7%
Q1 24
14.7%
17.8%
EPS (diluted)
AMR
AMR
BKH
BKH
Q4 25
$-1.35
$1.39
Q3 25
$-0.42
$0.34
Q2 25
$-0.38
$0.38
Q1 25
$-2.60
$1.87
Q4 24
$-0.09
$1.36
Q3 24
$0.29
$0.35
Q2 24
$4.49
$0.33
Q1 24
$9.59
$1.87

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
AMR
AMR
BKH
BKH
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$415.6M
$182.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$9.8M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.5B
$3.8B
Total Assets
$2.3B
$10.9B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.01×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
AMR
AMR
BKH
BKH
Q4 25
$415.6M
$182.8M
Q3 25
$457.9M
$21.1M
Q2 25
$449.0M
$8.1M
Q1 25
$448.0M
$6.6M
Q4 24
$481.6M
$16.1M
Q3 24
$484.6M
$12.5M
Q2 24
$336.1M
$624.8M
Q1 24
$269.4M
$123.0M
Total Debt
AMR
AMR
BKH
BKH
Q4 25
$9.8M
Q3 25
$2.9M
Q2 25
$3.1M
Q1 25
$2.4M
Q4 24
$2.9M
Q3 24
$3.6M
Q2 24
$5.3M
Q1 24
$6.0M
Stockholders' Equity
AMR
AMR
BKH
BKH
Q4 25
$1.5B
$3.8B
Q3 25
$1.6B
$3.8B
Q2 25
$1.6B
$3.6B
Q1 25
$1.6B
$3.6B
Q4 24
$1.6B
$3.5B
Q3 24
$1.7B
$3.4B
Q2 24
$1.6B
$3.4B
Q1 24
$1.6B
$3.3B
Total Assets
AMR
AMR
BKH
BKH
Q4 25
$2.3B
$10.9B
Q3 25
$2.3B
$10.3B
Q2 25
$2.4B
$10.1B
Q1 25
$2.4B
$10.1B
Q4 24
$2.4B
$10.0B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$9.7B
Q2 24
$2.5B
$10.2B
Q1 24
$2.5B
$9.7B
Debt / Equity
AMR
AMR
BKH
BKH
Q4 25
0.01×
Q3 25
0.00×
Q2 25
0.00×
Q1 25
0.00×
Q4 24
0.00×
Q3 24
0.00×
Q2 24
0.00×
Q1 24
0.00×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
AMR
AMR
BKH
BKH
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$19.0M
$168.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-10.0M
$-101.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-1.9%
-16.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
5.6%
43.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.60×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$17.8M
$-146.4M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
AMR
AMR
BKH
BKH
Q4 25
$19.0M
$168.1M
Q3 25
$50.5M
$88.9M
Q2 25
$53.2M
$188.6M
Q1 25
$22.2M
$227.8M
Q4 24
$56.3M
$153.2M
Q3 24
$189.5M
$102.1M
Q2 24
$138.1M
$230.6M
Q1 24
$196.1M
$233.4M
Free Cash Flow
AMR
AMR
BKH
BKH
Q4 25
$-10.0M
$-101.5M
Q3 25
$25.4M
$-89.5M
Q2 25
$18.6M
$-30.3M
Q1 25
$-16.3M
$74.9M
Q4 24
$13.6M
$-60.5M
Q3 24
$158.0M
$-86.0M
Q2 24
$77.0M
$64.4M
Q1 24
$132.5M
$57.2M
FCF Margin
AMR
AMR
BKH
BKH
Q4 25
-1.9%
-16.3%
Q3 25
4.8%
-20.9%
Q2 25
3.4%
-7.0%
Q1 25
-3.1%
9.4%
Q4 24
2.2%
-10.3%
Q3 24
23.6%
-21.6%
Q2 24
9.6%
16.2%
Q1 24
15.4%
8.0%
Capex Intensity
AMR
AMR
BKH
BKH
Q4 25
5.6%
43.3%
Q3 25
4.8%
41.7%
Q2 25
6.3%
50.2%
Q1 25
7.3%
19.1%
Q4 24
6.9%
36.5%
Q3 24
4.7%
47.2%
Q2 24
7.6%
41.9%
Q1 24
7.4%
24.6%
Cash Conversion
AMR
AMR
BKH
BKH
Q4 25
1.60×
Q3 25
3.57×
Q2 25
6.86×
Q1 25
1.70×
Q4 24
1.56×
Q3 24
49.81×
4.18×
Q2 24
2.34×
10.11×
Q1 24
1.54×
1.82×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

AMR
AMR

Segment breakdown not available.

BKH
BKH

Gas Utilities$391.1M63%
Retail Electric Natural Gasand Coal$189.7M30%
Other$15.3M2%
Market Off System Sales$13.6M2%
Transferred At Point In Time$8.9M1%
Wholesale$4.9M1%
Inter Segment Revenues$2.4M0%

Related Comparisons