vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amarin Corp plc (AMRN) and Fangdd Network Group Ltd. (DUO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amarin Corp plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($45.1M vs $28.4M, roughly 1.6× Fangdd Network Group Ltd.). Fangdd Network Group Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -18.7% vs -23.3%, a 4.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fangdd Network Group Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (47.4% vs 7.0%).
Amarin Corporation is an Irish-American biopharmaceutical company founded in 1993 and headquartered in Dublin, Ireland and Bridgewater, New Jersey. The company develops and markets medicines for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. It has developed the drug Vascepa (AMR-101), a prescription grade omega-3 fatty acid.
Fangdd Network Group Ltd. operates a leading digital real estate service platform in China, offering property listing, transaction matching, home furnishing consultation and operational support for buyers, sellers, agents and real estate development enterprises across multiple domestic city tiers.
AMRN vs DUO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $45.1M | $28.4M |
| Net Profit | $-10.5M | $-5.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.1% |
| Operating Margin | 35.5% | -35.3% |
| Net Margin | -23.3% | -18.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 47.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 33.0% | -322.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-1.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $45.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $49.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.7M | $28.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.5M | $19.3M |
| Q1 26 | $-10.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.1M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-48.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $2.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 47.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.2% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.4% | 12.5% |
| Q1 26 | 35.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -12.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.0% | -35.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -84.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -59.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.8% | -49.0% |
| Q1 26 | -23.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.4% | -18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -37.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -78.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -59.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 12.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $-1.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $307.8M | $24.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $53.1M |
| Total Assets | $645.8M | $94.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $307.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $302.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $298.7M | $24.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $281.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $294.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $306.7M | $18.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $459.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $458.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $464.9M | $53.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $486.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $531.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $551.9M | $29.4M |
| Q1 26 | $645.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $670.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $659.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $670.1M | $94.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $655.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $685.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $750.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $799.9M | $92.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-3.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.7M | $-808.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-957.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -5.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.81× | -0.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMRN
| U.S | $35.6M | 79% |
| Europe | $4.9M | 11% |
| Rest-of-World (ROW) | $2.8M | 6% |
| Licensing & Royalties | $1.8M | 4% |
DUO
Segment breakdown not available.
