vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES (AMS) and Natera, Inc. (NTRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Natera, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($665.5M vs $7.7M, roughly 86.1× AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES). Natera, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.1% vs -8.2%, a 15.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Natera, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (39.8% vs -14.8%). Natera, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.8M vs $-2.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Natera, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (34.5% CAGR vs 21.7%).
American Shared Hospital Services offers turnkey outsourced solutions for advanced radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery and diagnostic imaging equipment to healthcare facilities. It eliminates high upfront capital costs for hospitals, operates primarily across North America, and also serves Latin America and select Asia-Pacific markets, catering to both public and private hospital segments.
Natera, Inc. is a clinical genetic testing company based in Austin, Texas that specializes in non-invasive, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing technology, with a focus on women’s health, cancer, and organ health. Natera’s proprietary technology combines novel molecular biology techniques with a suite of bioinformatics software that allows detection down to a single molecule in a tube of blood. Natera operates CAP-accredited laboratories certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment...
AMS vs NTRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.7M | $665.5M |
| Net Profit | $-631.0K | $47.3M |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -18.1% | -3.4% |
| Net Margin | -8.2% | 7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -14.8% | 39.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 52.5% | 187.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.7M | $665.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2M | $592.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $546.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1M | $501.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1M | $476.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0M | $439.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $413.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $367.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-631.0K | $47.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.0K | $-87.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-280.0K | $-100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-625.0K | $-66.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $-53.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-207.0K | $-31.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $-37.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $119.0K | $-67.6M |
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 41.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -18.1% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.8% | -16.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.7% | -20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.3% | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.2% | -13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.7% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.0% | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.6% | -20.2% |
| Q4 25 | -8.2% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.2% | -14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.0% | -18.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.2% | -13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -14.6% | -11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.0% | -7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.0% | -9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | -18.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.09 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.00 | $-0.64 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.74 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.21 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.55 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.02 | $-0.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $17.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.0M | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $55.5M | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.2M | $17.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.0M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.2M | $90.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.8M | $69.1M |
| Q4 25 | $17.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $24.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $878.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.5M | $836.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.8M | $794.1M |
| Q4 25 | $55.5M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.1M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.68× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-704.0K | $73.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.7M | $37.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -34.8% | 5.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.7% | 5.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.56× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.5M | $109.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-704.0K | $73.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $59.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-372.0K | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | $44.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $274.0K | $52.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $472.0K | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.9M | $27.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.7M | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.0M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.4M | $34.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-407.0K | $35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.0K | $-7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | -34.8% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -32.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -48.4% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -58.4% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | 25.7% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.7% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.67× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMS
| Direct Patient Services | $4.0M | 51% |
| Rental Income From Medical Services | $2.7M | 35% |
| Pbrt Services | $1.2M | 15% |
NTRA
Segment breakdown not available.
