vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($86.5M vs $74.5M, roughly 1.2× AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs 34.9%, a 123.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs 4.9%). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($96.2M vs $2.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (81.1% CAGR vs 33.2%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company, offering personal and commercial banking, wealth management, residential mortgage lending, and small business financing services. Its core market covers Virginia and adjacent Mid-Atlantic regions, serving retail consumers, SMEs, and high-net-worth clients.
AMSC vs BHRB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $86.5M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $30.2M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 43.8% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | 34.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 4.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | 52.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $1.98 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $86.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $85.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $87.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $83.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $82.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $69.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $26.4M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $30.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $29.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $27.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $27.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $-16.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 43.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 42.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 39.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 39.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | -27.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 22.3% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | 34.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 35.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 32.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 33.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | -24.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $1.98 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $1.97 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $1.97 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $1.80 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $1.72 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $1.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $-1.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $0.69 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $854.6M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $7.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $854.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $822.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $780.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $758.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $730.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $738.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $693.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $319.3M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $8.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $7.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $7.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $3.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $107.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $96.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | 111.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 13.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | 3.57× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | $164.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $107.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $41.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $37.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $85.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $47.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-46.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $96.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $35.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $81.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $46.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $-47.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 111.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 41.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | -3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 43.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 98.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | 55.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | -67.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 21.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | 3.57× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | 1.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | 4.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | 1.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.36× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
BHRB
Segment breakdown not available.
