vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and Elme Communities (ELME). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($74.5M vs $62.1M, roughly 1.2× Elme Communities). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs -198.9%, a 357.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs 1.7%). Elme Communities produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.2M vs $2.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 2.7%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Elme Communities is a publicly traded U.S. real estate investment trust that primarily owns, operates and develops high-quality multifamily residential communities. It focuses on key growth markets across the U.S. Mid-Atlantic and Southeast, offering affordable to mid-tier housing options for diverse renter groups.
AMSC vs ELME — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $62.1M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $-123.5M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | 61.1% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | -183.3% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | -198.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | -4058.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $-1.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $62.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $62.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $61.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $61.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $60.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $59.5M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $-123.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $-3.6M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | 61.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | 63.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 62.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | 63.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | 63.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | 63.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | -183.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 7.5% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | -198.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | -7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | -5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | -6.1% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $-1.40 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | $7.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $908.9M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $908.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $1.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $15.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $7.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | 11.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 14.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | $86.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $29.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $16.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $95.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $28.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $21.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $47.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $7.6M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 34.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 78.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 34.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 12.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 77.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 22.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
ELME
| Residential Segment | $57.7M | 93% |
| Other | $4.4M | 7% |
