vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and Evolus, Inc. (EOLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evolus, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($90.3M vs $74.5M, roughly 1.2× AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs 0.1%, a 157.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs 14.4%). Evolus, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($11.3M vs $2.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 23.4%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Evolus, Inc. is a medical aesthetics company focused on developing and commercializing non-surgical cosmetic treatment solutions. Its flagship product is a prescription neuromodulator designed to reduce moderate to severe glabellar frown lines, serving licensed aesthetic healthcare providers and consumers across North America, Europe, and key Asia-Pacific regional markets.
AMSC vs EOLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $90.3M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $130.0K |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | 65.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 4.7% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | 0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 14.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | 101.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $90.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $69.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $68.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $78.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $66.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $59.3M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $130.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $-15.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $-13.1M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | 65.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | 66.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | 65.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 68.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | 70.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | 68.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | -14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | -25.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | -11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | -15.0% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | -22.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | -24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | -27.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | -31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | -17.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | -22.1% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | $53.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $146.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $-23.1M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $225.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | $53.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | $43.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $61.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $67.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $87.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $85.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $93.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | $97.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $146.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $121.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $121.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $121.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $120.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $120.6M |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $-28.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $-18.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $19.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $18.4M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $225.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $219.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $228.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $213.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $232.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $229.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $233.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $226.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.26× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.54× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $12.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $11.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | 12.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | 98.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | $-45.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $-24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $-10.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $11.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $-25.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $-6.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $-10.9M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | -22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | -36.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | -23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | -9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | -10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -18.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | 98.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
EOLS
Segment breakdown not available.
