vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and EQUITY BANCSHARES INC (EQBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($74.5M vs $63.5M, roughly 1.2× EQUITY BANCSHARES INC). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs 34.8%, a 123.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EQUITY BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.4% vs 21.4%). EQUITY BANCSHARES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($38.1M vs $2.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Houston, Texas with operations in Texas and central Oklahoma. As of December 31, 2019, the company operated 285 branches: 65 in the Houston area, including The Woodlands, Texas; 30 in South Texas, including Corpus Christi, Texas and Victoria, Texas; 75 in the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex; 22 in East Texas; 29 in Central Texas, including Austin, Texas and San Antonio; 34 in West Texas, including Lubbock, Texas, Midland–Odess...
AMSC vs EQBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $63.5M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $22.1M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 41.7% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | 34.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 28.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | 30.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $1.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $63.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $58.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $60.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $58.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $55.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $55.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $55.9M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $-29.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $17.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $14.1M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 41.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | -207.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 43.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 29.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | 34.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | -164.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 26.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 35.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | 25.2% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $1.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $-1.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.76 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $0.90 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $443.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $732.1M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $6.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $443.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $486.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $448.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $376.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $312.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $437.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $391.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $367.1M |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $732.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $711.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $635.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $617.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $592.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $504.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $461.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $456.8M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $5.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.80× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $51.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $38.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | 60.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 20.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | 2.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | $88.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $28.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $73.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $23.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $12.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $38.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $65.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $15.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 44.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 112.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | 35.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 27.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 19.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | 2.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | 1.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | 4.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.90× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
EQBK
Segment breakdown not available.
