vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP (GOOD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($74.5M vs $43.5M, roughly 1.7× GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs 12.4%, a 145.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs 16.3%). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 10.3%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Gladstone Commercial Corp is a publicly traded US real estate investment trust focused on acquiring, owning, and operating diversified industrial and commercial properties. It offers long-term net lease agreements to tenants across manufacturing, logistics, healthcare and professional services sectors, mainly serving small to mid-sized business clients.
AMSC vs GOOD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $43.5M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $5.4M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | 12.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 16.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | -25.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $43.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $39.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $37.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $39.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $37.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $35.7M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $11.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | 9.9% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | $10.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $843.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $171.8M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.91× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | $10.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $10.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | $10.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $843.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $843.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $794.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $740.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $693.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $692.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $722.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $719.4M |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $171.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $184.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $177.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $183.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $171.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $168.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $145.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $147.3M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.56× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.96× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.88× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $88.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | 16.38× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $88.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $35.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $57.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | 16.38× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | 4.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | 7.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | 3.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | 7.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
GOOD
Segment breakdown not available.
