vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and Katapult Holdings, Inc. (KPLT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($74.5M vs $73.9M, roughly 1.0× Katapult Holdings, Inc.). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs 26.8%, a 131.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs 17.3%). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.4M vs $-12.0M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Katapult Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-based fintech company that provides accessible point-of-sale lease-to-purchase solutions for consumers with limited or no traditional credit history. It partners with a wide network of e-commerce platforms and brick-and-mortar retail merchants across segments including electronics, furniture and home goods to offer flexible payment plans for customers to obtain needed products.
AMSC vs KPLT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $73.9M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $19.8M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | 15.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | -1.4% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | 26.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | 307.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $3.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $73.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $74.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $71.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $71.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $60.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $58.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $65.1M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $-6.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $-570.0K |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | 25.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | -1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | -2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | -4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | 26.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | -10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | -7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | -14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | -0.9% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $3.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $-0.94 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $-1.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $-2.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-2.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $-1.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | $22.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $-38.1M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $107.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $25.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $33.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | $31.2M |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $-38.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $-58.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $-54.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $-51.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $-46.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $-40.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $-32.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $-27.5M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $107.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $85.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $90.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $88.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $92.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $106.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $106.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $-11.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $-12.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | -16.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | -0.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $-32.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-628.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $-32.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $-653.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | -16.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | -51.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | -9.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | -0.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
KPLT
Segment breakdown not available.
