vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and Lifevantage Corp (LFVN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($74.5M vs $48.9M, roughly 1.5× Lifevantage Corp). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs 0.6%, a 157.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs -27.8%). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.4M vs $1.7M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 0.7%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Lifevantage Corp is a health and wellness enterprise that develops, manufactures and distributes science-backed nutritional supplements, skincare and personal care products. It operates via a direct-to-consumer network marketing model, serving customers across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific, with focus on anti-aging and holistic health solution segments.
AMSC vs LFVN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $48.9M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $276.0K |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | 74.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 1.0% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | 0.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | -27.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | -89.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $47.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $58.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $67.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $48.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $48.2M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $276.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | 74.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | 79.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | 79.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 81.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 80.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | 79.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | 79.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | 78.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $33.0M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $61.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $20.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $16.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $33.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $34.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $34.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $29.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $27.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $26.8M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $61.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $72.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $77.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $68.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $61.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $60.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $61.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $2.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $1.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | 3.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | 10.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | $1.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $-583.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $835.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $-932.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $2.8M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | 10.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | 0.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | 3.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | -0.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
LFVN
Segment breakdown not available.
