vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($74.5M vs $43.4M, roughly 1.7× Montauk Renewables, Inc.). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs 5.7%, a 152.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Montauk Renewables, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (56.7% vs 21.4%). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.4M vs $-41.1M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 5.8%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Montauk Renewables, Inc. is a US-based renewable energy firm specializing in capturing and converting biogenic methane from landfills and agricultural waste into renewable natural gas (RNG) and low-carbon electricity. It serves utility, commercial, and industrial customers across North America, with operations focused on advancing decarbonization and sustainable energy transition goals.
AMSC vs MNTK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $43.4M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $2.5M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | -3.8% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | 5.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 56.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | 129.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $43.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $45.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $27.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $65.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $43.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $38.8M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-464.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $-712.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | 22.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | -35.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 34.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | -1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | -1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | $23.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $126.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $263.1M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $435.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.48× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | $23.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $40.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $45.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $42.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | $63.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $126.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $54.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $57.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $46.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $52.7M |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $263.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $260.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $254.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $258.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $257.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $255.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $254.3M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $435.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $383.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $382.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $354.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $349.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $374.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $362.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $354.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.21× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $337.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $-41.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | -94.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 95.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | 0.14× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | $-86.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $337.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $724.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $193.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $14.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $-41.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $-17.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $-25.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $-18.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $-7.7M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | -94.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | -37.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | -56.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | -29.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | -42.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -19.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 95.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 65.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 74.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 32.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 43.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 56.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | 2.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | 1.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.73× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
MNTK
| Natural Gas Environmental Attributes | $28.1M | 65% |
| Natural Gas Commodity | $10.7M | 25% |
| Electric Commodity | $2.7M | 6% |
| Electric Environmental Attributes | $2.0M | 5% |
