vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and NB Bancorp, Inc. (NBBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($74.5M vs $63.4M, roughly 1.2× NB Bancorp, Inc.). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs 12.2%, a 145.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NB Bancorp, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (33.9% vs 21.4%). NB Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($57.4M vs $2.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 22.6%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
NB Bancorp, Inc. is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating through its fully owned banking subsidiary. It provides a full range of retail and commercial banking services including various deposit products, consumer loans, residential mortgages, and small business financing solutions, primarily catering to individual and small-to-mid-sized enterprise customers across the New York metropolitan area.
AMSC vs NBBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $63.4M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $7.7M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 23.5% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | 12.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 33.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | -50.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $63.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $51.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $47.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $47.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $42.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $41.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $42.1M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $14.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $8.7M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 36.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 37.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 28.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 28.8% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 33.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 22.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | 20.7% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $0.39 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $858.9M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $7.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $858.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $737.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $739.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $765.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $747.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $734.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $733.8M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $4.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $60.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $57.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | 90.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 5.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | 7.89× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | $117.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $60.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $24.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $43.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $-11.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $23.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $9.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $41.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $23.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $-11.7M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 90.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 46.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 51.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 20.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 87.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 57.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -27.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | 7.89× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | 1.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | 0.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.31× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
NBBK
Segment breakdown not available.
