vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and OppFi Inc. (OPFI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OppFi Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($85.6M vs $74.5M, roughly 1.1× AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs 19.7%, a 138.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs 5.9%). OppFi Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($382.2M vs $2.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 16.3%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
OppFi Inc. is a US-headquartered financial technology firm that provides responsible, accessible financial solutions including installment loans, credit-building tools and related support services to consumers underserved by traditional banking institutions, prioritizing fair terms to help users boost their long-term financial wellness.
AMSC vs OPFI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $85.6M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $16.8M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 36.1% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | 19.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 5.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | 400.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $1.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $85.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $104.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $100.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $90.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $80.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $91.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $86.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $63.2M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $16.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $41.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $-20.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $5.5M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 36.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 46.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 46.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 38.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 39.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | -20.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | -12.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | 8.8% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $1.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $-0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | $49.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $58.5M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $754.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | $49.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | $45.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $45.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $58.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $61.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $44.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $46.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | $47.2M |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $58.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $49.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $32.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $34.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $18.2M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $754.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $720.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $673.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $640.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $641.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $619.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $573.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $563.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $401.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $382.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | 446.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 22.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | 23.82× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | $652.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $401.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $105.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $95.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $83.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $323.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $77.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $77.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $74.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $382.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $99.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $91.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $79.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $310.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $73.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $74.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $72.3M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 446.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 95.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 90.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 87.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 384.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | 80.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 86.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 114.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | 23.82× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | 2.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | 18.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
OPFI
Segment breakdown not available.