vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and Purple Innovation, Inc. (PRPL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Purple Innovation, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($140.7M vs $74.5M, roughly 1.9× AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs -2.3%, a 160.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs 9.1%). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.4M vs $-7.8M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 8.3%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Purple Carrot is a Needham, Massachusetts-based, and 100% plant-based meal kit company. Founded by Andy Levitt, it offers both prepared meals as well as meal kits to subscribers weekly. As stated in a 2022 article in Cosmopolitan, “each Purple Carrot meal kit results in 72% less carbon being released into the atmosphere as compared to the standard American meal.”
AMSC vs PRPL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $140.7M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $-3.2M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | 41.9% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | -1.6% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | -2.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | 62.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $140.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $118.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $105.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $104.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $118.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $120.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $120.0M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $-39.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $27.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $-50.2M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | 41.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | 35.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 39.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 42.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | 40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | 34.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | -6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | -39.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | -19.3% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | -9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | -16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | -18.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | -33.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | -41.8% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | $24.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $126.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $-29.7M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $296.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | $24.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | $32.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $34.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $21.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | $34.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $126.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $70.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $50.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $-29.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $-26.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $20.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $66.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $65.5M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $296.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $302.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $303.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $293.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $307.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $309.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $362.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $382.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $-5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $-7.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | -5.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | $-41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $-968.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $-16.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $-25.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $101.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $-19.9M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | -6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | -24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | -9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -16.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -330.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
PRPL
| Cost Of Revenues | $81.7M | 58% |
| Other | $59.0M | 42% |
