vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($74.5M vs $39.4M, roughly 1.9× SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs 54.9%, a 103.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs 1.1%). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $2.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 14.1%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
AMSC vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $527.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |
