vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and Sezzle Inc. (SEZL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sezzle Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($78.2M vs $74.5M, roughly 1.0× AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs 54.6%, a 103.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sezzle Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (61.6% vs 21.4%). Sezzle Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($70.6M vs $2.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Sezzle Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (76.0% CAGR vs 33.2%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Sezzle is a publicly traded financial technology company headquartered in Minneapolis, U.S, with operations in the United States and Canada. The company provides an alternative payment platform offering interest-free installment plans at selected online stores. As of June 2021, the Sezzle platform had over 10 million user sign-ups and over 48,000 participating merchants.
AMSC vs SEZL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $78.2M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $42.7M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 70.6% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | 54.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 61.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | 68.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $1.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $57.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $48.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $48.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $35.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $25.2M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $42.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $26.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $36.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $29.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $8.0M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 70.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 61.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 69.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 63.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 58.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 55.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 54.8% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | 54.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 53.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 75.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 98.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | 31.7% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $1.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.82 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | $64.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $169.8M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $400.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $88.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $88.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $73.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $80.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | $77.8M |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $169.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $130.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $125.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $87.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $50.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $29.6M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $400.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $367.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $350.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $298.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $298.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $252.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $212.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $195.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $70.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $70.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | 90.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | $209.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $70.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $63.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $23.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $52.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $16.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $70.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $63.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $52.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $16.0M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 90.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 110.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 108.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 118.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | 98.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 73.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 63.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | 2.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | 0.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | 1.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | 2.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | 2.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.00× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
SEZL
| Merchant And Partner Income | $28.9M | 37% |
| Transaction Income | $25.9M | 33% |
| Income From Other Services Late Payment Fees | $20.5M | 26% |
| Other | $2.9M | 4% |