vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and Whitestone REIT (WSR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($74.5M vs $43.9M, roughly 1.7× Whitestone REIT). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs 52.0%, a 106.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs 7.5%). Whitestone REIT produced more free cash flow last quarter ($50.5M vs $2.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 8.7%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Whitestone REIT is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that acquires, owns, manages and redevelops open-air community shopping centers, primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the southwestern and southeastern United States. Its property portfolio is largely anchored by daily necessity, service-focused retail tenants that cater to regular local consumer demand.
AMSC vs WSR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $43.9M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $22.8M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 53.0% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | 52.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 7.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | 31.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.43 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $43.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $41.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $37.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $38.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $40.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $38.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $37.2M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $22.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $17.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $7.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 53.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 25.9% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | 52.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 42.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | 25.1% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.43 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $0.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | $4.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $649.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $458.1M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | $4.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $649.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $632.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $458.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $439.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $427.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $431.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $438.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $419.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $418.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $421.6M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $50.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $50.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | 114.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | 2.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $50.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $3.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $58.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $11.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $50.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $58.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 114.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 142.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | 2.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | 2.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | 0.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | 3.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.73× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.23× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
WSR
Segment breakdown not available.