vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERISAFE INC (AMSF) and DMC Global Inc. (BOOM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DMC Global Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.5M vs $80.1M, roughly 1.8× AMERISAFE INC). AMERISAFE INC runs the higher net margin — 10.2% vs -7.8%, a 17.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERISAFE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.3% vs -5.8%). Over the past eight quarters, AMERISAFE INC's revenue compounded faster (2.8% CAGR vs -7.3%).
AMERISAFE Inc. is a specialty insurance provider that focuses exclusively on workers' compensation coverage for small and mid-sized businesses in high-hazard industries including construction, logging, trucking, and manufacturing. It operates across 49 U.S. states, offering tailored insurance policies paired with targeted risk management support for clients.
DMC Mining Services is a mining services contractor founded in 1980 operating in Canada, the United States, Chile, and Mongolia
AMSF vs BOOM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.1M | $143.5M |
| Net Profit | $8.1M | $-11.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -7.8% |
| Net Margin | 10.2% | -7.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | -5.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.0% | -3871.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $-0.60 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $80.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $81.6M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.0M | $151.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.1M | $155.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.6M | $159.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.0M | $152.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.7M | $152.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.8M | $171.2M |
| Q1 26 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.0M | $116.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $677.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $296.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.3M | $-101.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $4.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | -7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | -97.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | -7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.2% | -66.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $-0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.72 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.73 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.47 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.69 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.75 | $-8.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.57 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.2M | $31.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $50.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $246.6M | $242.1M |
| Total Assets | — | $635.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.21× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $61.9M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.7M | $26.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.5M | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.8M | $14.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6M | $14.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $50.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $56.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $58.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $72.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $70.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $74.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $84.1M |
| Q1 26 | $246.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $251.6M | $242.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.8M | $253.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $265.6M | $253.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $260.8M | $253.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.3M | $251.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.4M | $256.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $301.0M | $416.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $635.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $644.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $645.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $670.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $671.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $702.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $869.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.20× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $15.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $9.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $37.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.1M | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.7M | $18.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.4M | $15.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | $11.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $19.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $2.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.9M | $9.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.5M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $709.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $-204.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.7% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.5% | -0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 1.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.61× | 131.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.20× | 6.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.83× | 39.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.24× | 0.58× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSF
Segment breakdown not available.
BOOM
| Dyna Energetics Segment | $68.9M | 48% |
| Other | $57.0M | 40% |
| Nobel Clad Segment | $17.7M | 12% |
