vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERISAFE INC (AMSF) and BingEx Ltd (FLX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BingEx Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.2M vs $80.1M, roughly 1.8× AMERISAFE INC). AMERISAFE INC runs the higher net margin — 10.2% vs 2.2%, a 7.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
AMERISAFE Inc. is a specialty insurance provider that focuses exclusively on workers' compensation coverage for small and mid-sized businesses in high-hazard industries including construction, logging, trucking, and manufacturing. It operates across 49 U.S. states, offering tailored insurance policies paired with targeted risk management support for clients.
AMSF vs FLX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.1M | $143.2M |
| Net Profit | $8.1M | $3.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 10.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 10.2% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $80.1M | $143.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $81.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.0M | $141.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.1M | $143.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.6M | $141.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.7M | $164.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | $8.1M | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.0M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $27.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.3M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.73 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.47 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.75 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.57 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.2M | $561.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $246.6M | — |
| Total Assets | — | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $34.2M | $561.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $61.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.7M | $628.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.5M | $499.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.8M | $592.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $517.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | $246.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $251.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $265.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $260.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $301.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $926.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
