vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERISAFE INC (AMSF) and Grindr Inc. (GRND). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Grindr Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($126.0M vs $80.1M, roughly 1.6× AMERISAFE INC). Grindr Inc. runs the higher net margin — 16.1% vs 10.2%, a 5.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Grindr Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.0% vs 10.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Grindr Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.3% CAGR vs 2.8%).
AMERISAFE Inc. is a specialty insurance provider that focuses exclusively on workers' compensation coverage for small and mid-sized businesses in high-hazard industries including construction, logging, trucking, and manufacturing. It operates across 49 U.S. states, offering tailored insurance policies paired with targeted risk management support for clients.
Grindr is a location-based social networking and online hookup application for LGBTQ people.
AMSF vs GRND — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.1M | $126.0M |
| Net Profit | $8.1M | $20.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 24.9% |
| Net Margin | 10.2% | 16.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | 29.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.0% | 116.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $80.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $81.6M | $126.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.0M | $115.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.1M | $104.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.6M | $93.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.0M | $97.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.7M | $89.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.8M | $82.3M |
| Q1 26 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4M | $20.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $30.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.0M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $27.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $-123.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.3M | $24.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $-22.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | 39.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | 23.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.5% | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | 31.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | 29.8% |
| Q1 26 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | 26.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 28.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | -126.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.2% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | -27.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.72 | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.73 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.47 | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.69 | $-0.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.75 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.57 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.2M | $87.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $395.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $246.6M | $47.0M |
| Total Assets | — | $531.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 8.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $61.9M | $87.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.7M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.5M | $120.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.8M | $255.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | $59.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $39.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6M | $16.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $395.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $279.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $283.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $287.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $290.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $294.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $297.7M |
| Q1 26 | $246.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $251.6M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.8M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $265.6M | $187.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $260.8M | $319.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.3M | $-131.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.4M | $-13.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $301.0M | $-41.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $531.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $439.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $547.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $679.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $479.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $456.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $435.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.94× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $24.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $24.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 19.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $140.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.1M | $24.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.7M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.4M | $37.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $23.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | $29.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $15.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.9M | $24.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | $55.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.5M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | $29.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $28.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $15.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | 47.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.7% | 35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | 25.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 30.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.5% | 19.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.06× | 1.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.77× | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.61× | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.20× | 0.88× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.59× | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSF
Segment breakdown not available.
GRND
| License And Service | $102.9M | 82% |
| Advertising | $23.1M | 18% |