vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERISAFE INC (AMSF) and Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($153.3M vs $80.1M, roughly 1.9× AMERISAFE INC). AMERISAFE INC runs the higher net margin — 10.2% vs -13.5%, a 23.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (231.8% vs 10.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (537.7% CAGR vs 2.8%).
AMERISAFE Inc. is a specialty insurance provider that focuses exclusively on workers' compensation coverage for small and mid-sized businesses in high-hazard industries including construction, logging, trucking, and manufacturing. It operates across 49 U.S. states, offering tailored insurance policies paired with targeted risk management support for clients.
Energy Vault is a global energy storage company specializing in gravity and kinetic energy based, long-duration energy storage products. Energy Vault's primary product is a gravity battery to store energy by stacking heavy blocks made of composite material into a structure, capturing potential energy in the elevation gain of the blocks. When demand for electricity is high, these blocks are lowered with the motors functioning as generators and delivering electricity to the grid.
AMSF vs NRGV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.1M | $153.3M |
| Net Profit | $8.1M | $-20.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 20.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 74.3% |
| Net Margin | 10.2% | -13.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | 231.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.0% | 66.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | — | $153.3M | ||
| Q1 26 | $80.1M | $21.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $81.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.0M | $33.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.1M | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.6M | $8.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.0M | $33.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.7M | $1.2M |
| Q2 26 | — | $-20.7M | ||
| Q1 26 | $8.1M | $-32.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.0M | $-34.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $-61.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.3M | $-26.6M |
| Q2 26 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 57.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 40.3% |
| Q2 26 | — | 74.3% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | -32.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | -52.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | -330.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.5% | -244.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | -150.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | -2258.1% |
| Q2 26 | — | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 26 | 10.2% | -148.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | -80.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | -410.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | -247.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | -184.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.2% | -2217.9% |
| Q2 26 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 26 | $0.43 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.72 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.73 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.47 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.69 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.75 | $-0.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.2M | $58.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $38.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $246.6M | $67.5M |
| Total Assets | — | $312.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.56× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | $58.3M | ||
| Q1 26 | $34.2M | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $61.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.7M | $32.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.5M | $22.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.8M | $21.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | $30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $51.1M |
| Q2 26 | — | $38.0M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $160.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q2 26 | — | $67.5M | ||
| Q1 26 | $246.6M | $30.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $251.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.8M | $80.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $265.6M | $90.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $260.8M | $114.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.3M | $126.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.4M | $179.1M |
| Q2 26 | — | $312.9M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $298.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $281.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $248.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $217.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $183.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $252.9M |
| Q2 26 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 5.27× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.