vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERISAFE INC (AMSF) and Twin Hospitality Group Inc. (TWNP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Twin Hospitality Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($82.3M vs $80.1M, roughly 1.0× AMERISAFE INC). AMERISAFE INC runs the higher net margin — 10.2% vs -29.7%, a 39.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
AMERISAFE Inc. is a specialty insurance provider that focuses exclusively on workers' compensation coverage for small and mid-sized businesses in high-hazard industries including construction, logging, trucking, and manufacturing. It operates across 49 U.S. states, offering tailored insurance policies paired with targeted risk management support for clients.
Target Hospitality is a company that provides workforce lodging and other temporary, modular housing used for oil, gas and mining operations; large-scale events; and disaster relief. Target Hospitality is based in The Woodlands, Texas, and also has offices in Williston, North Dakota; Denver, Colorado; Calgary, Alberta.
AMSF vs TWNP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.1M | $82.3M |
| Net Profit | $8.1M | $-24.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -16.2% |
| Net Margin | 10.2% | -29.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $-0.43 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $80.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $81.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.0M | $82.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.1M | $87.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.6M | $87.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $-24.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.0M | $-20.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | -16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | -13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.5% | -1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | -29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | -23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | -13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.72 | $-0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.73 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.47 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.75 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.57 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $402.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $246.6M | $-92.1M |
| Total Assets | — | $516.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $61.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $402.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $411.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $413.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $246.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $251.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.8M | $-92.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $265.6M | $-78.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $260.8M | $-101.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $301.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $516.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $535.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $544.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-5.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-7.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -9.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.7M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.4M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.5M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-9.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | -9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.7% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | -11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.20× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
