vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amesite Inc. (AMST) and Largo Inc. (LGO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amesite Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($108.0K vs $87.6K, roughly 1.2× Largo Inc.). Largo Inc. runs the higher net margin — -59.3% vs -678.0%, a 618.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Amesite Inc is a US-based edtech firm that develops and delivers AI-powered cloud learning management systems and customized online learning solutions. Its core offerings cater to higher education institutions, corporate clients, and government organizations, enabling scalable, personalized upskilling, professional training, and academic course delivery across North America.
Largo Inc. is a Canada-based critical minerals producer focused on sustainable vanadium extraction and processing. It operates core production assets in Brazil, supplying high-purity vanadium products for steel manufacturing, grid-scale energy storage, and industrial clients across global markets.
AMST vs LGO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $108.0K | $87.6K |
| Net Profit | $-732.5K | $-52.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -689.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -678.0% | -59.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 746.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 34.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.16 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $108.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.3K | $87.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.8K | $54.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $100.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $70.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $42.2K | ||
| Q4 23 | $41.4K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-732.5K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-642.3K | $-52.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-924.0K | $-40.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-18.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-18.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $715 | ||
| Q4 23 | $-905.6K | — |
| Q4 25 | -689.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -702.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1538.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -2307.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -678.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -681.1% | -59.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1657.1% | -73.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -64.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -18.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | -2185.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.36 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5M | — |
| Total Assets | $2.0M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $3.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $4.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $4.6M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-621.1K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-621.1K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-415.8K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-439.4K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | $-919.1K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.93× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
