vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of American Tower (AMT) and Packaging Corporation of America (PKG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

American Tower is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7B vs $2.4B, roughly 1.2× Packaging Corporation of America). American Tower runs the higher net margin — 110.1% vs 7.2%, a 102.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Packaging Corporation of America posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.6% vs 6.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Packaging Corporation of America's revenue compounded faster (6.8% CAGR vs 3.7%).

American Tower Corporation, one of the largest global REITs, is a leading independent owner, operator and developer of multitenant communications real estate with a portfolio of approximately 219,000 communications sites. For more information about American Tower, please visit the Earnings Materials and Investor Presentations sections of our investor relations website at www.americantower.com.

Packaging Corporation of America is an American manufacturing company based in Lake Forest, Illinois. The company has about 15,500 employees, with operations primarily in the United States. The CEO is Mark W. Kowlzan.

AMT vs PKG — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
AMT
AMT
1.2× larger
AMT
$2.7B
$2.4B
PKG
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PKG
PKG
+3.8% gap
PKG
10.6%
6.8%
AMT
Higher net margin
AMT
AMT
102.9% more per $
AMT
110.1%
7.2%
PKG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PKG
PKG
Annualised
PKG
6.8%
3.7%
AMT

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
AMT
AMT
PKG
PKG
Revenue
$2.7B
$2.4B
Net Profit
$3.0B
$170.9M
Gross Margin
19.1%
Operating Margin
0.0%
10.6%
Net Margin
110.1%
7.2%
Revenue YoY
6.8%
10.6%
Net Profit YoY
-2.6%
-16.1%
EPS (diluted)
$1.91

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
AMT
AMT
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
$2.7B
$2.4B
Q4 25
$2.7B
$2.4B
Q3 25
$2.7B
$2.3B
Q2 25
$2.6B
$2.2B
Q1 25
$2.6B
$2.1B
Q4 24
$2.5B
$2.1B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$2.2B
Q2 24
$2.5B
$2.1B
Net Profit
AMT
AMT
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
$3.0B
$170.9M
Q4 25
$836.8M
$101.9M
Q3 25
$912.6M
$226.9M
Q2 25
$380.5M
$241.5M
Q1 25
$498.6M
$203.8M
Q4 24
$1.2B
$221.2M
Q3 24
$-780.4M
$238.1M
Q2 24
$908.4M
$198.9M
Gross Margin
AMT
AMT
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
19.1%
Q4 25
18.9%
Q3 25
21.8%
Q2 25
22.2%
Q1 25
21.2%
Q4 24
21.9%
Q3 24
23.1%
Q2 24
21.1%
Operating Margin
AMT
AMT
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
0.0%
10.6%
Q4 25
42.4%
7.1%
Q3 25
45.4%
14.0%
Q2 25
45.6%
15.4%
Q1 25
48.9%
13.1%
Q4 24
42.4%
14.1%
Q3 24
45.2%
15.0%
Q2 24
45.4%
13.3%
Net Margin
AMT
AMT
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
110.1%
7.2%
Q4 25
30.6%
4.3%
Q3 25
33.6%
9.8%
Q2 25
14.5%
11.1%
Q1 25
19.5%
9.5%
Q4 24
48.3%
10.3%
Q3 24
-30.9%
10.9%
Q2 24
35.7%
9.6%
EPS (diluted)
AMT
AMT
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
$1.91
Q4 25
$1.76
$1.14
Q3 25
$1.82
$2.51
Q2 25
$0.78
$2.67
Q1 25
$1.04
$2.26
Q4 24
$2.63
$2.45
Q3 24
$-1.69
$2.64
Q2 24
$1.92
$2.21

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
AMT
AMT
PKG
PKG
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.6B
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.2B
Total Assets
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
AMT
AMT
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
$1.6B
Q4 25
$1.5B
$529.0M
Q3 25
$2.0B
$634.0M
Q2 25
$2.1B
$787.9M
Q1 25
$2.1B
$751.7M
Q4 24
$2.0B
$685.0M
Q3 24
$2.2B
$676.6M
Q2 24
$2.2B
$613.6M
Total Debt
AMT
AMT
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$33.8B
$4.0B
Q3 25
$34.9B
$4.0B
Q2 25
$35.2B
Q1 25
$34.0B
Q4 24
$32.8B
$2.5B
Q3 24
$33.4B
$2.5B
Q2 24
$35.6B
Stockholders' Equity
AMT
AMT
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
$10.2B
Q4 25
$3.7B
$4.6B
Q3 25
$4.0B
$4.8B
Q2 25
$3.7B
$4.6B
Q1 25
$3.5B
$4.5B
Q4 24
$3.4B
$4.4B
Q3 24
$3.6B
$4.3B
Q2 24
$3.9B
$4.1B
Total Assets
AMT
AMT
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$63.2B
$10.7B
Q3 25
$63.9B
$11.0B
Q2 25
$63.8B
$9.0B
Q1 25
$62.1B
$9.0B
Q4 24
$61.1B
$8.8B
Q3 24
$62.8B
$8.8B
Q2 24
$65.8B
$9.0B
Debt / Equity
AMT
AMT
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
9.26×
0.87×
Q3 25
8.82×
0.84×
Q2 25
9.48×
Q1 25
9.63×
Q4 24
9.70×
0.57×
Q3 24
9.16×
0.58×
Q2 24
9.24×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
AMT
AMT
PKG
PKG
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$941.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
34.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
16.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$6.7B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
AMT
AMT
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$5.5B
$446.6M
Q3 25
$1.5B
$472.2M
Q2 25
$1.3B
$299.6M
Q1 25
$1.3B
$339.1M
Q4 24
$5.3B
$325.4M
Q3 24
$1.5B
$327.1M
Q2 24
$1.3B
$278.3M
Free Cash Flow
AMT
AMT
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
$941.0M
Q4 25
$3.8B
$127.6M
Q3 25
$994.5M
$280.1M
Q2 25
$976.9M
$129.9M
Q1 25
$963.9M
$191.0M
Q4 24
$3.7B
$124.1M
Q3 24
$1.0B
$180.4M
Q2 24
$1.0B
$33.3M
FCF Margin
AMT
AMT
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
34.4%
Q4 25
138.2%
5.4%
Q3 25
36.6%
12.1%
Q2 25
37.2%
6.0%
Q1 25
37.6%
8.9%
Q4 24
145.3%
5.8%
Q3 24
41.4%
8.3%
Q2 24
39.8%
1.6%
Capex Intensity
AMT
AMT
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
16.8%
Q4 25
61.4%
13.5%
Q3 25
17.1%
8.3%
Q2 25
11.6%
7.8%
Q1 25
12.9%
6.9%
Q4 24
62.4%
9.4%
Q3 24
16.8%
6.7%
Q2 24
12.8%
11.8%
Cash Conversion
AMT
AMT
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
6.53×
4.38×
Q3 25
1.60×
2.08×
Q2 25
3.37×
1.24×
Q1 25
2.60×
1.66×
Q4 24
4.30×
1.47×
Q3 24
1.37×
Q2 24
1.47×
1.40×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons