vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Tower (AMT) and Stanley Black & Decker (SWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Stanley Black & Decker is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.7B, roughly 1.4× American Tower). American Tower runs the higher net margin — 110.1% vs 1.4%, a 108.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, American Tower posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.8% vs 0.1%). American Tower produced more free cash flow last quarter ($941.0M vs $155.3M). Over the past eight quarters, American Tower's revenue compounded faster (3.7% CAGR vs 0.3%).
American Tower Corporation, one of the largest global REITs, is a leading independent owner, operator and developer of multitenant communications real estate with a portfolio of approximately 219,000 communications sites. For more information about American Tower, please visit the Earnings Materials and Investor Presentations sections of our investor relations website at www.americantower.com.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
AMT vs SWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.7B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $3.0B | $51.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | 0.0% | — |
| Net Margin | 110.1% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.8% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2.6% | -43.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $836.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $912.6M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $380.5M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $498.6M | $90.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $194.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-780.4M | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $908.4M | $-11.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.4% |
| Q1 26 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.2% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.4% | 9.5% |
| Q1 26 | 110.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.3% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -30.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.7% | -0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.76 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.82 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.78 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.04 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.63 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.69 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.92 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.6B | $268.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.2B | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | — | $21.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $311.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $344.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $290.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $318.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.2B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.0B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.8B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.4B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.6B | $6.1B |
| Q1 26 | $10.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $8.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.9B | $21.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.8B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.1B | $22.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.1B | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.8B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.8B | $22.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.26× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.82× | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.48× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.63× | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.70× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.16× | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.24× | 0.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $221.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $941.0M | $155.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 34.4% | 4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 16.8% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.7B | $369.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $-420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $679.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $573.0M |
| Q1 26 | $941.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $994.5M | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $976.9M | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $963.9M | $-485.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $564.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $485.8M |
| Q1 26 | 34.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 138.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.6% | -13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 145.3% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.8% | 12.1% |
| Q1 26 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.8% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.53× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.60× | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.37× | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.60× | -4.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.30× | 3.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.47× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMT
Segment breakdown not available.
SWK
| Tools And Outdoor Segment | $3.3B | 87% |
| Engineered Fastening Segment | $500.5M | 13% |
