vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amentum Holdings, Inc. (AMTM) and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($38.8B vs $3.2B, roughly 12.0× Amentum Holdings, Inc.). Alibaba Group Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs 1.4%, a 4.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Jacobs Solutions Inc. is an American international technical professional services firm based in Dallas. The company provides engineering, technical, professional, and construction services as well as scientific and specialty consulting for a broad range of clients globally, including companies, organizations, and government agencies. Jacobs has consistently ranked No. 1 on both Engineering News-Record (ENR)'s 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 Top 500 Design Firms and Trenchless Technolo...
Alibaba Group Holding Limited, branded as Alibaba, is a Chinese multinational technology company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. Founded on 28 June 1999 in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, the company provides consumer-to-consumer (C2C), business-to-consumer (B2C), and business-to-business (B2B) sales services via Chinese and global marketplaces, as well as local consumer, digital media and entertainment, logistics, and cloud computing services. It owns and operates a diverse...
AMTM vs BABA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.2B | $38.8B |
| Net Profit | $44.0M | $2.2B |
| Gross Margin | 10.1% | 40.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | 6.6% |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 266.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $6.64 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $38.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $32.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $38.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $44.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $40.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.0M | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 40.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | 38.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.6% | 42.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | $6.64 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.72 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $5.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $20.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.29 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $247.0M | $18.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.6B | $148.7B |
| Total Assets | $11.2B | $268.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.86× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $247.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $437.0M | $18.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $19.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $738.0M | $20.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $546.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $522.0M | $22.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $148.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $145.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $139.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $137.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $11.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.5B | $268.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $264.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.8B | $248.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9B | $254.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-136.0M | $5.2B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-142.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -3.09× | 2.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $272.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-136.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $270.0M | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.0M | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.0M | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $-142.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $261.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | -4.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | -3.09× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.75× | 2.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.60× | 2.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.25× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.17× | 1.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMTM
| Global Engineering Solutions Segment | $1.9B | 59% |
| Other U.S.Government Agencies | $400.0M | 12% |
| Fixed Price Contract | $380.0M | 12% |
| Commercial And International | $226.0M | 7% |
| Time And Materials Contract | $171.0M | 5% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $78.0M | 2% |
| Equity Method Investee | $50.0M | 2% |
BABA
| Alibaba China E-commerce Group | $22.8B | 59% |
| All others | $9.6B | 25% |
| Cloud Intelligence Group | $6.2B | 16% |
