vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amentum Holdings, Inc. (AMTM) and Boston Scientific (BSX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Boston Scientific is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.2B vs $3.2B, roughly 1.6× Amentum Holdings, Inc.). Boston Scientific runs the higher net margin — 25.7% vs 1.4%, a 24.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Boston Scientific posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.6% vs -5.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Amentum Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (25.6% CAGR vs 12.4%).
Jacobs Solutions Inc. is an American international technical professional services firm based in Dallas. The company provides engineering, technical, professional, and construction services as well as scientific and specialty consulting for a broad range of clients globally, including companies, organizations, and government agencies. Jacobs has consistently ranked No. 1 on both Engineering News-Record (ENR)'s 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 Top 500 Design Firms and Trenchless Technolo...
Boston Scientific Corporation (BSC) is an American biotechnology and biomedical engineering firm and multinational manufacturer of medical devices used in interventional medical specialties, including interventional radiology, interventional cardiology, peripheral interventions, neuromodulation, neurovascular intervention, electrophysiology, cardiac surgery, vascular surgery, endoscopy, oncology, urology and gynecology.
AMTM vs BSX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.2B | $5.2B |
| Net Profit | $44.0M | $1.3B |
| Gross Margin | 10.1% | 69.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | 25.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.2% | 11.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 266.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $4.1B |
| Q1 26 | $44.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $40.0M | $670.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $755.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0M | $795.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0M | $672.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.0M | $563.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.0M | $468.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.0M | $322.0M |
| Q1 26 | 10.1% | 69.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 69.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | 67.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | 68.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.6% | 67.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 68.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | 69.2% |
| Q1 26 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 12.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.4% | 25.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 12.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.2% | 7.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.51 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.02 | $0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.31 | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.29 | $0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $247.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.6B | — |
| Total Assets | $11.2B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.86× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $247.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $437.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $738.0M | $534.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $546.0M | $725.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $522.0M | $414.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $11.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $11.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $10.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7B | $9.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | $9.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.0B |
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $24.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $22.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $22.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $20.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.0M | $20.4B |
| Q1 26 | $11.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.5B | $43.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $42.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.8B | $41.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0B | $40.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9B | $39.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0B | $38.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $37.1B |
| Q1 26 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.88× | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.01× | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.06× | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.05× | 0.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.05× | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.44× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-136.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-142.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -3.09× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $272.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-136.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $270.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.0M | $541.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $813.0M |
| Q1 26 | $-142.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $261.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.0M | $354.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $823.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $658.0M |
| Q1 26 | -4.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 22.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 25.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.0% |
| Q1 26 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | -3.09× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.75× | 2.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.60× | 1.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.25× | 0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.17× | 2.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.52× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMTM
| Global Engineering Solutions Segment | $1.9B | 59% |
| Other U.S.Government Agencies | $400.0M | 12% |
| Fixed Price Contract | $380.0M | 12% |
| Commercial And International | $226.0M | 7% |
| Time And Materials Contract | $171.0M | 5% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $78.0M | 2% |
| Equity Method Investee | $50.0M | 2% |
BSX
| Cardiovascular | $3.5B | 67% |
| Endoscopy | $736.0M | 14% |
| Urology | $646.0M | 12% |
| Neuromodulation | $318.0M | 6% |
