vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amentum Holdings, Inc. (AMTM) and CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD (CHKP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amentum Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.2B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.6× CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD). CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD runs the higher net margin — 38.0% vs 1.4%, a 36.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD produced more free cash flow last quarter ($895.5M vs $-142.0M).
Jacobs Solutions Inc. is an American international technical professional services firm based in Dallas. The company provides engineering, technical, professional, and construction services as well as scientific and specialty consulting for a broad range of clients globally, including companies, organizations, and government agencies. Jacobs has consistently ranked No. 1 on both Engineering News-Record (ENR)'s 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 Top 500 Design Firms and Trenchless Technolo...
Check Point Software Technologies is an Israeli cybersecurity company with operations in over 60 countries. Its headquarters are located in Tel Aviv, Israel, and the company maintains a significant presence in Redwood City, California, United States. The company protects over 100,000 organizations globally and is home to the Check Point Research team. It is a partner organization of the World Economic Forum.
AMTM vs CHKP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.2B | $2.0B |
| Net Profit | $44.0M | $752.4M |
| Gross Margin | 10.1% | 86.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | 30.2% |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | 38.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 266.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $6.81 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $44.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $40.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $752.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 86.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 38.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.81 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.29 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $247.0M | $619.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.6B | $3.1B |
| Total Assets | $11.2B | $5.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.86× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $247.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $437.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $619.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $738.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $546.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $522.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $11.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-136.0M | $914.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-142.0M | $895.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.4% | 45.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -3.09× | 1.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $272.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-136.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $270.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $914.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $-142.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $261.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $895.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | -4.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | -3.09× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.75× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.60× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.25× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.17× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMTM
| Global Engineering Solutions Segment | $1.9B | 59% |
| Other U.S.Government Agencies | $400.0M | 12% |
| Fixed Price Contract | $380.0M | 12% |
| Commercial And International | $226.0M | 7% |
| Time And Materials Contract | $171.0M | 5% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $78.0M | 2% |
| Equity Method Investee | $50.0M | 2% |
CHKP
| Security subscriptions | $812.0M | 41% |
| Software updates and maintenance | $712.0M | 36% |
| Products and licenses | $337.3M | 17% |
| Other | $119.2M | 6% |
