vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN WOODMARK CORP (AMWD) and BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. (BBBY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($394.6M vs $247.8M, roughly 1.6× BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.). AMERICAN WOODMARK CORP runs the higher net margin — 1.5% vs -6.6%, a 8.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.9% vs -12.8%). AMERICAN WOODMARK CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($638.0K vs $-12.8M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN WOODMARK CORP's revenue compounded faster (-3.3% CAGR vs -21.1%).
American Woodmark Corporation is a kitchen and bath cabinet manufacturer headquartered in Winchester, Virginia. The company operates several manufacturing facilities and service centers. The manufacturing facilities are located in Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia with service centers being located throughout the country.
Bed Bath & Beyond was an American big-box retail chain specializing in housewares, furniture, and specialty items. Headquartered in Union, New Jersey, the chain operated stores in the United States and Canada, and was once counted among the Fortune 500 and the Forbes Global 2000. The chain filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in April 2023 and liquidated all of its remaining stores, with the last closing on July 30, 2023. Following the retail chain's liquidation, its name was adopted by online ret...
AMWD vs BBBY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $394.6M | $247.8M |
| Net Profit | $6.1M | $-16.4M |
| Gross Margin | 15.2% | 23.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.1% | 68.8% |
| Net Margin | 1.5% | -6.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -12.8% | 6.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -78.0% | 58.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.42 | $-0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $247.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $394.6M | $273.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.0M | $257.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $400.4M | $282.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $397.6M | $231.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $452.5M | $303.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $459.1M | $311.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.3M | $398.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-16.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | $-20.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6M | $-19.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6M | $-39.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.7M | $-81.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.6M | $-61.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.8M | $-42.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 25.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.0% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.0% | 25.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.9% | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.2% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.6% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 68.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | -4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | -4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | -10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.4% | -11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | -14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | -11.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | -7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | -1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | -6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | -17.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | -26.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | -19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | -10.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.42 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.00 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.73 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $-0.74 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.79 | $-1.68 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.89 | $-1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.70 | $-0.93 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $52.1M | $135.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $363.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $928.2M | $202.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $404.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.39× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $135.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $52.1M | $175.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.9M | $167.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.2M | $120.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.5M | $114.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.7M | $159.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.3M | $140.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.4M | $186.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $363.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $365.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $367.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $368.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $372.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $371.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $202.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $928.2M | $217.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $920.3M | $202.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $916.0M | $130.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $919.6M | $143.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $915.1M | $162.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $913.8M | $196.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $910.4M | $250.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $404.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $425.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $414.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $358.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $363.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $402.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $428.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $496.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $11.2M | $-11.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $638.0K | $-12.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.2% | -5.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.83× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.0M | $-24.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-11.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.2M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.1M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.8M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0M | $-50.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | $-42.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.3M | $-75.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-12.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $638.0K | $-8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.3M | $-17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.8M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $-52.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.5M | $-45.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2M | $-80.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | -22.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | -8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.4% | -14.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | -20.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.27× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.38× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMWD
| Home Center Retailers | $166.7M | 42% |
| Builders | $164.7M | 42% |
| Independent Dealersand Distributors | $63.2M | 16% |
BBBY
Segment breakdown not available.
