vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN WOODMARK CORP (AMWD) and ICU MEDICAL INC (ICUI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ICU MEDICAL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($540.7M vs $394.6M, roughly 1.4× AMERICAN WOODMARK CORP). AMERICAN WOODMARK CORP runs the higher net margin — 1.5% vs -2.9%, a 4.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN WOODMARK CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-12.8% vs -14.1%). ICU MEDICAL INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($36.0M vs $638.0K). Over the past eight quarters, ICU MEDICAL INC's revenue compounded faster (-2.3% CAGR vs -3.3%).
American Woodmark Corporation is a kitchen and bath cabinet manufacturer headquartered in Winchester, Virginia. The company operates several manufacturing facilities and service centers. The manufacturing facilities are located in Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia with service centers being located throughout the country.
ICU Medical, Inc. is a medical technology company based in San Clemente, California. ICU Medical products are designed to prevent bloodstream infections and protect healthcare workers from exposure to infectious diseases or hazardous drugs. ICU Medical product line includes intravenous therapy (IV) products, pumps, needle-free vascular access devices, custom infusion sets, closed system hazardous drug handling devices and systems, sensor catheters, needle-free closed blood sampling systems, a...
AMWD vs ICUI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $394.6M | $540.7M |
| Net Profit | $6.1M | $-15.7M |
| Gross Margin | 15.2% | 37.5% |
| Operating Margin | 3.1% | 1.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.5% | -2.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -12.8% | -14.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -78.0% | 34.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.42 | $-0.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $394.6M | $540.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.0M | $537.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $400.4M | $548.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $397.6M | $604.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $452.5M | $629.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $459.1M | $589.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.3M | $596.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $422.1M | $566.7M |
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | $-15.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6M | $35.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6M | $-15.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.7M | $-23.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.6M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.8M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.2M | $-39.5M |
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 37.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.0% | 37.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.0% | 34.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.9% | 36.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.2% | 34.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.6% | 34.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.2% | 32.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | -2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | -5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | -7.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.42 | $-0.63 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.00 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.73 | $1.43 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $-0.63 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.79 | $-0.97 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.89 | $-1.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.70 | $-0.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.32 | $-1.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $52.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $363.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $928.2M | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $4.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.39× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $52.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.7M | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.3M | $312.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.4M | $302.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $97.8M | $251.4M |
| Q4 25 | $363.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $365.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $367.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $368.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $372.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $371.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $371.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $928.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $920.3M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $916.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $919.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $915.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $913.8M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $910.4M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $896.9M | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $4.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.41× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $11.2M | $60.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $638.0K | $36.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.2% | 6.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.83× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.0M | $91.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.2M | $60.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.1M | $56.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.8M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0M | $51.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $40.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | $36.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.3M | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.7M | $45.8M |
| Q4 25 | $638.0K | $36.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.3M | $27.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.8M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $36.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $16.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.5M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2M | $62.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.1M | $29.9M |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | -1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.27× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.75× | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.38× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMWD
| Home Center Retailers | $166.7M | 42% |
| Builders | $164.7M | 42% |
| Independent Dealersand Distributors | $63.2M | 16% |
ICUI
| Infusion Consumables | $284.7M | 53% |
| Infusion Systems | $176.3M | 33% |
| Vital Care | $79.7M | 15% |
